Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33946478›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Comparative Analysis Based on Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Data Reveal Differences between Emmer and Durum Wheat in Response to Nitrogen Starvation.

Romina Beleggia, Nooshin Omranian, Yan Holtz, Tania Gioia, Fabio Fiorani, Franca M Nigro, Nicola Pecchioni, Pasquale De Vita, Ulrich Schurr, Jacques L David and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Romina BeleggiaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-5033
Nooshin OmranianSystems Biology and Mathematical Modeling Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Yan HoltzMontpellier SupAgro, UMR Amelioration Genetique et Adaptation des Plantes, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Tania GioiaScuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8980-3034
Fabio FioraniInstitute of Biosciences and Geosciences (IBG-2): Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, 52428 Julich, Germany.
Franca M NigroCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Nicola PecchioniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Pasquale De VitaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9573-0510
Ulrich SchurrInstitute of Biosciences and Geosciences (IBG-2): Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, 52428 Julich, Germany.
Jacques L DavidMontpellier SupAgro, UMR Amelioration Genetique et Adaptation des Plantes, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Zoran NikoloskiSystems Biology and Mathematical Modeling Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Roberto PapaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops (CREA-CI), 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9598-3131
Cereal Research Centre · ITForschungszentrum Jülich · DEInstitut Agro Montpellier · FRUniversity of Potsdam · DEMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Basilicata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence indicates the key role of nitrogen (N) on diverse processes in plant, including development and defense. Using a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics approach, we studied the response of seedlings to N starvation of two different tetraploid wheat genotypes from the two main domesticated subspecies: emmer and durum wheat. We found that durum wheat exhibits broader and stronger response in comparison to emmer as seen from the expression pattern of both genes and metabolites and gene enrichment analysis. They showed major differences in the responses to N starvation for transcription factor families, emmer showed differential reduction in the levels of primary metabolites while durum wheat exhibited increased levels of most of them to N starvation. The correlation-based networks, including the differentially expressed genes and metabolites, revealed tighter regulation of metabolism in durum wheat in comparison to emmer. We also found that glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) had highest values of centrality in the metabolic correlation network, suggesting their critical role in the genotype-specific response to N starvation of emmer and durum wheat, respectively. Moreover, this finding indicates that there might be contrasting strategies associated to GABA and glutamate signaling modulating shoot vs. root growth in the two different wheat subspecies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantMetabolomeNitrogenSeedlingsTetraploidyTranscriptomeTriticumNitrogenGABAglutamatemetabolomicsplant nutritionstresstranscriptomicsTriticum turgidum

Identifiers

PMID33946478
PMCPMC8124848
OpenAlexW3158923443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.