Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33946431›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Extracellular Polymeric Substance Protects Some Cells in an

Helen M Greer, Kanesha Overton, Megan A Ferguson, Eileen M Spain, Louise E O Darling, Megan E Núñez, Catherine B Volle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chitosan-graphene quantum dot based active film as smart wound dressing.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Helen M GreerDepartment of Biology, Cottey College, Nevada, MO 64772, USA.
Kanesha OvertonDepartment of Biology, Cottey College, Nevada, MO 64772, USA.
Megan A FergusonDepartment of Chemistry, State University of New York, New Paltz, NY 12561, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-4564
Eileen M SpainDepartment of Chemistry, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041, USA.
Louise E O DarlingDepartment of Biological Sciences and Program in Biochemistry, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-8024
Megan E NúñezDepartment of Chemistry and Program in Biochemistry, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4576-6926
Catherine B VolleDepartments of Biology and Chemistry, Cornell College, Mount Vernon, IA 52314, USA.
Cottey College · USWellesley College · USCornell University · USOccidental College · USSUNY New Paltz · US

Funding

Quantitative AFM Investigations of Adhesion of a Planktonic Bacterial Predator to Biofilm PreyR15GM120665 · NIGMS · OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE · PI FERGUSON, MEGAN A, NUNEZ, MEGAN ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2016
$391k
National Science Foundation DBI1528288NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM120665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial biofilms have long been recognized as a source of persistent infections and industrial contamination with their intransigence generally attributed to their protective layer of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). EPS, consisting of secreted nucleic acids, proteins, and polysaccharides, make it difficult to fully eliminate biofilms by conventional chemical or physical means. Since most bacteria are capable of forming biofilms, understanding how biofilms respond to new antibiotic compounds and components of the immune system has important ramifications. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are both potential novel antibiotic compounds and part of the immune response in many different organisms. Here, we use atomic force microscopy to investigate the biomechanical changes that occur in individual cells when a biofilm is exposed to the AMP magainin 2 (MAG2), which acts by permeabilizing bacterial membranes. While MAG2 is able to prevent biofilm initiation, cells in an established biofilm can withstand exposure to high concentrations of MAG2. Treated cells in the biofilm are classified into two distinct populations after treatment: one population of cells is indistinguishable from untreated cells, maintaining cellular turgor pressure and a smooth outer surface, and the second population of cells are softer than untreated cells and have a rough outer surface after treatment. Notably, the latter population is similar to planktonic cells treated with MAG2. The EPS likely reduces the local MAG2 concentration around the stiffer cells since once the EPS was enzymatically removed, all cells became softer and had rough outer surfaces. Thus, while MAG2 appears to have the same mechanism of action in biofilm cells as in planktonic ones, MAG2 cannot eradicate a biofilm unless coupled with the removal of the EPS.

Indexed as

atomic force microscopybiofilmcell stiffnessmagainin 2surface roughness

Identifiers

PMID33946431
PMCPMC8147140
OpenAlexW3159961395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.