Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33946056›Full record

ArticleBiomedical materials (Bristol, England)2021

Polymer-coated microparticle scaffolds engineered for potential use in musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.

Gelareh Samandi, Vineet Gupta, Neethu Mohan, Peter McHugh, Cory Berkland, Michael Detamore, Stefan Lohfeld

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gelareh SamandiDepartment of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States of America.
Vineet GuptaUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States of America.
Neethu MohanBiomedical Technology Wing, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences & Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala 695011, India.
Peter McHughBiomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-3652
Cory BerklandDepartment of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States of America.
Michael DetamoreStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7525-8132
Stefan LohfeldDepartment of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-244X
University of Kansas · USOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · INUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Gradient-based strategy for osteochondral regenerationR01AR056347 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials constructed exclusively of sintered microspheres have great potential in tissue engineering scaffold applications, offering the ability to create shape-specific scaffolds with precise controlled release yet to be matched by traditional additive manufacturing methods. The problem is that these microsphere-based scaffolds are limited in their stiffness for applications such as bone regeneration. Our vision to solve this problem was borne from a hierarchical structure perspective, focusing on the individual unit of the structure: the microsphere itself. In a core-shell approach, we envisioned a stiff core to create a stiff microsphere unit, with a polymeric shell that would enable sintering to the other microsphere units. Therefore, the current study provided a comparison of macroscopic biomaterials built on either polymer microspheres or polymer-coated hard glass microspheres. Identical polycaprolactone (PCL) polymer solutions were used to fabricate microspheres and as a thin coating on soda lime glass microspheres (hard phase). The materials were characterized as loose particles and as scaffolds via scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, Raman spectroscopy, mechanical testing, and a live/dead analysis with human umbilical cord-derived Wharton's jelly cells. The elastic modulus of the scaffolds with the thinly coated hard phase was about five times higher with glass microspheres (up to about 25 MPa) than pure polymer microspheres, while retaining the structure, cell adhesion, and chemical properties of the PCL polymer. This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the ability to achieve at least a five-fold increase in macroscopic stiffness via altering the core microsphere units with a core-shell approach.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedCell SurvivalCoated Materials, BiocompatibleElastic ModulusHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMicrospheresMusculoskeletal SystemPolyestersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblepolycaprolactonePolyesterscharacterizationcoatingsmicrospherestissue engineering scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID33946056
PMCPMC10630092
OpenAlexW3157163421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.