Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945847›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer2021

Modeling pancreatic cancer in mice for experimental therapeutics.

Kavita Mallya, Shailendra K Gautam, Abhijit Aithal, Surinder K Batra, Maneesh Jain

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Exploring heterogeneity: a dive into preclinical models of cancer cachexia.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavita MallyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870, USA.
Shailendra K GautamDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870, USA. Electronic address: shailendra.gautam@unmc.edu.
Abhijit AithalDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870, USA.
Surinder K BatraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870, USA; Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Maneesh JainDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5870, USA; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. Electronic address: mjain@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Project 3: MUC16-Mediated Metabolic Reprograming Induces PC MetastasisP01CA217798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2018 to 2022
$8.1M
Modulation of Tumor Microenvironment for Improved Therapy of Pancreatic CancerR01CA247471 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., JAIN, MANEESH · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
Nanovaccine platforms to combat pancreatic cancerU01CA213862 · NCI · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JAIN, MANEESH, NARASIMHAN, BALAJI · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Targeted Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic CancerR01CA195586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., JAIN, MANEESH · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA217798NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195586NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247471NCI NIH HHS U01 CA213862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that is characterized by early metastasis, low resectability, high recurrence, and therapy resistance. The experimental mouse models have played a central role in understanding the pathobiology of PDAC and in the preclinical evaluation of various therapeutic modalities. Different mouse models with targetable pathological hallmarks have been developed and employed to address the unique challenges associated with PDAC progression, metastasis, and stromal heterogeneity. Over the years, mouse models have evolved from simple cell line-based heterotopic and orthotopic xenografts in immunocompromised mice to more complex and realistic genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) involving multi-gene manipulations. The GEMMs, mostly driven by KRAS mutation(s), have been widely accepted for therapeutic optimization due to their high penetrance and ability to recapitulate the histological, molecular, and pathological hallmarks of human PDAC, including comparable precursor lesions, extensive metastasis, desmoplasia, perineural invasion, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Advanced GEMMs modified to express fluorescent proteins have allowed cell lineage tracing to provide novel insights and a new understanding about the origin and contribution of various cell types in PDAC pathobiology. The syngeneic mouse models, GEMMs, and target-specific transgenic mice have been extensively used to evaluate immunotherapies and study therapy-induced immune modulation in PDAC yielding meaningful results to guide various clinical trials. The emerging mouse models for parabiosis, hepatic metastasis, cachexia, and image-guided implantation, are increasingly appreciated for their high translational significance. In this article, we describe the contribution of various experimental mouse models to the current understanding of PDAC pathobiology and their utility in evaluating and optimizing therapeutic modalities for this lethal malignancy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMice, TransgenicNeoplasms, ExperimentalPancreatic NeoplasmsPhenotypeSpecies SpecificityTumor MicroenvironmentXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsAntibody-targeted therapyCachexiaImmunotherapyMetastasisMouse modelPancreatic cancerParabiosisTargeted therapyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID33945847
PMCPMC8570383
OpenAlexW3157377634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.