ArticleCancer2021
Electronic symptom monitoring in pediatric patients hospitalized for chemotherapy.
Article in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions in Pediatric Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Patient-Reported Outcome Benefits for Children with Advanced Cancer and Parents: A Qualitative Study.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023Trial
- Making Symptoms Visible: The Impact of Real-Time PROM Integration in Pediatric Oncology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing Quality of Life and Symptoms in Transplantation and CAR-T Recipients: Expert Panel Recommendations from the Survivorship Special Interest Group of ASTCT.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- The implementation and strategy of triadic communication in pediatric oncology: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- A scoping review of the electronic collection and capture of patient reported outcome measures for children and young people in the hospital setting.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Routine use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures for children and young people: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research-A workshop report.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Agreement and disagreement between child-caregiver symptom and function reports in pediatric oncology.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
- Patient-reported outcome measures in children, adolescents, and young adults with palliative care needs-a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Using IT to Improve Outcomes for Children Living With Cancer (SyMon-SAYS): Protocol for a Single-Institution Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Checking IN: Development, Acceptability, and Feasibility of a Pediatric Electronic Distress Screener.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2023Article
- Inclusion of a core patient-reported outcomes battery in adolescent and young adult cancer clinical trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Review
- Use of Daily Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Pediatric Cancer Care.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- A Narrative Review on the Collection and Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Survivorship Care with Emphasis on Symptom Monitoring.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Ethical Principles in Digital Palliative Care for Children: The MyPal Project and Experiences Made in Designing a Trustworthy Approach.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Review
- Symptom screening via screen: Real-time electronic tracking of pediatric patient-reported outcomes.Cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUsing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring in oncology has resulted in significant benefits for adult patients with cancer. The feasibility of this approach has not been established in the routine care of children with cancer.
methodsThe Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Ped-PRO-CTCAE) is an item library that enables children and caregivers to self-report symptoms. Ten symptom items from the Ped-PRO-CTCAE were uploaded to an online platform. Patients at least 7 years old and their caregivers were prompted by text/email message to electronically self-report daily during a planned hospitalization for chemotherapy administration. Symptom reports were emailed to the clinical team caring for the patient, but no instructions were given regarding the use of this information. Rates of patient participation and clinician responses to reports were systematically tracked.
resultsThe median age of the participating patients (n = 52) was 11 years (range, 7-18 years). All patients and caregivers completed an initial login, with 92% of dyads completing at least 1 additional symptom assessment during hospitalization (median, 3 assessments; range, 0-40). Eighty-one percent of participating dyads submitted symptom reports on at least half of hospital days, and 54% submitted reports on all hospital days. Clinical actions were taken in response to symptom reports 21% of the time. Most patients felt that the system was easy (73%) and important (79%). Most clinicians found symptom reports easy to understand and useful (97%).
conclusionsSymptom monitoring using patient-reported outcome measures for hospitalized pediatric oncology patients is feasible and generates data valued by clinicians and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.