Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945616›Full record

ArticleBlood2021

Low-burden TP53 mutations in CLL: clinical impact and clonal evolution within the context of different treatment options.

Jitka Malcikova, Sarka Pavlova, Barbara Kunt Vonkova, Lenka Radova, Karla Plevova, Jana Kotaskova, Karol Pal, Barbara Dvorackova, Marcela Zenatova, Jakub Hynst and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The importance ofMolecular biology research communications · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Emergence ofEJHaem · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jitka MalcikovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-6698
Sarka PavlovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-1528-9743
Barbara Kunt VonkovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0002-9725-3818
Lenka RadovaCenter of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-148X
Karla PlevovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0002-6148-8877
Jana KotaskovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-7346
Karol PalCenter of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-4691
Barbara DvorackovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-1085-8767
Marcela ZenatovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0002-3855-6085
Jakub HynstCenter of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0079-845X
Eva OndrouskovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-0830-0692
Anna PanovskaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-4955-3039
Yvona BrychtovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-1038-870X
Kristyna ZavackaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0002-0753-051X
Boris TichyDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0001-9252-7974
Nikola TomCenter of Molecular Medicine, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7440-0515
Jiri MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0003-0567-9887
Michael DoubekDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0002-1269-6282
Sarka PospisilovaDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University; and.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-2680
Central European Institute of Technology · CZMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) bearing TP53 mutations experience chemorefractory disease and are therefore candidates for targeted therapy. However, the significance of low-burden TP53 mutations with <10% variant allele frequency (VAF) remains a matter for debate. Herein, we describe clonal evolution scenarios of low-burden TP53 mutations, the clinical impact of which we analyzed in a "real-world" CLL cohort. TP53 status was assessed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 511 patients entering first-line treatment with chemo- and/or immunotherapy and 159 patients in relapse before treatment with targeted agents. Within the pretherapy cohort, 16% of patients carried low-burden TP53 mutations (0.1% to 10% VAF). Although their presence did not significantly shorten event-free survival after first-line therapy, it affected overall survival (OS). In a subgroup with TP53 mutations of 1% to 10% VAF, the impact on OS was observed only in patients with unmutated IGHV who had not received targeted therapy, as patients benefited from switching to targeted agents, regardless of initial TP53 mutational status. Analysis of the clonal evolution of low-burden TP53 mutations showed that the highest expansion rates were associated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen in both first- and second-line treatments (median VAF increase, 14.8× and 11.8×, respectively) in contrast to treatment with less intense treatment regimens (1.6×) and no treatment (0.8×). In the relapse cohort, 33% of patients carried low-burden TP53 mutations, which did not expand significantly upon targeted treatment (median VAF change, 1×). Sporadic cases of TP53 mutations' clonal shifts were connected with the development of resistance-associated mutations. Altogether, our data support the incorporation of low-burden TP53 variants in clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Clonal EvolutionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansImmunotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedMutationTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID33945616
PMCPMC8703362
OpenAlexW3159166329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.