Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945583›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.

Ithan D Peltan, Sarah J Beesley, Brandon J Webb, Bert K Lopansri, Will Sinclair, Jason R Jacobs, Samuel M Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Screening and confirmation tests for SARS-CoV-2: benefits and drawbacks.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Laboratory Diagnosis for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  8. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ithan D PeltanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1730-234X
Sarah J BeesleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Brandon J WebbDivision of Infectious Disease and Clinical Epidemiology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Bert K LopansriIntermountain Laboratory Services, Department of Pathology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Will SinclairIntermountain Laboratory Services, Department of Pathology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Jason R JacobsDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3406-0410
Samuel M BrownDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Intermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

Prehospital Activation of ED Teams to Improve Sepsis CareK23GM129661 · NIGMS · IHC HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI PELTAN, ITHAN DANIEL · 2019 to 2023
$786k
Immunological Phenotyping of Febrile and Afebrile Critically Ill Septic PatientsK23GM129660 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DREWRY, ANNE MEREDITH · 2018 to 2020
$535k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM129660NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM129661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.

methodsAmong patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020 within an integrated healthcare system, we identified patients with a recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay ≥60 days after an initial positive test. To assign an overall likelihood of COVID-19 recurrence, we combined quantitative data from initial and recurrent positive RT-PCR cycle thresholds-a value inversely correlated with viral RNA burden- with a clinical recurrence likelihood assigned based on independent, standardized case review by two physicians. "Probable" or "possible" recurrence by clinical assessment was confirmed as the final recurrence likelihood only if a cycle threshold value obtained ≥60 days after initial testing was lower than its preceding cycle threshold or if the patient had an interval negative RT-PCR.

resultsAmong 23,176 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1,301 (5.6%) had at least one additional SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs assay ≥60 days later. Of 122 testing positive, 114 had sufficient data for evaluation. The median interval to the recurrent positive RT-PCR was 85.5 (IQR 74-107) days. After combining clinical and RT-PCR cycle threshold data, four patients (3.5%) met criteria for probable COVID-19 recurrence. All four exhibited symptoms at recurrence and three required a higher level of medical care compared to their initial diagnosis. After including six additional patients (5.3%) with possible recurrence, recurrence incidence was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1-7.9) cases per 10,000 COVID-19 patients.

conclusionsOnly 0.04% of all COVID-19 patients in our health system experienced probable or possible recurrence; 90% of repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs were not consistent with true recurrence. Our pragmatic approach combining clinical and quantitative RT-PCR data could aid assessment of COVID-19 reinfection or reactivation by clinicians and public health personnel.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsViral LoadRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33945583
PMCPMC8096096
OpenAlexW3159053485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.