Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945551›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Exhalatory dynamic interactions between patients connected to a shared ventilation device.

Pedro M Garcia Eijo, Juan D'Adamo, Arturo Bianchetti, Thomas Duriez, Juan M Cabaleiro, Célica Irrazabal, Pablo Otero, Guillermo Artana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro M Garcia EijoLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan D'AdamoLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arturo BianchettiLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Thomas DuriezLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan M CabaleiroLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Célica IrrazabalDivisión Terapia Intensiva del Hospital de Clínicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo OteroCátedra de Anestesiología y Algiología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guillermo ArtanaLaboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-1337-0126
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work a shared pressure-controlled ventilation device for two patients is considered. By the use of different valves incorporated to the circuit, the device enables the restriction of possible cross contamination and the individualization of tidal volumes, driving pressures, and positive end expiratory pressure PEEP. Possible interactions in the expiratory dynamics of different pairs of patients are evaluated in terms of the characteristic exhalatory times. These characteristic times can not be easily established using simple linear lumped element models. For this purpose, a 1D model using the Hydraulic and Mechanical libraries in Matlab Simulink was developed. In this sense, experiments accompany this study to validate the model and characterize the different valves of the circuit. Our results show that connecting two patients in parallel to a ventilator always resulted in delays of time during the exhalation. The size of this effect depends on different parameters associated with the patients, the circuit and the ventilator. The dynamics of the exhalation of both patients is determined by the ratios between patients exhalatory resistances, compliances, driving pressures and PEEPs. Adverse effects on exhalations became less noticeable when respiratory parameters of both patients were similar, flow resistances of valves added to the circuit were negligible, and when the ventilator exhalatory valve resistance was also negligible. The asymmetries of driving pressures, compliances or resistances exacerbated the possibility of auto-PEEP and the increase in relaxation times became greater in one patient than in the other. In contrast, exhalatory dynamics were less sensitive to the ratio of PEEP imposed to the patients.

Indexed as

ExhalationPositive-Pressure RespirationHumansRespiration, ArtificialTidal VolumeVentilators, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID33945551
PMCPMC8096090
OpenAlexW3157571263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.