Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945542›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Biochemical evidence of epicuticular wax compounds involved in cotton-whitefly interaction.

Muhammad Azam Ali, Muhammad Azmat Ullah Khan, Abdul Qayyum Rao, Adnan Iqbal, Salah Ud Din, Ahmad Ali Shahid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mutations in BrMYB31 lead to a glossy phenotype caused by a deficiency in epidermal wax crystals in Chinese cabbage.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant Responses to Herbivory, Wounding, and Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Azam AliCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1316-1765
Muhammad Azmat Ullah KhanDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Abdul Qayyum RaoCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Adnan IqbalCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Salah Ud DinCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ahmad Ali ShahidCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology (CEMB), University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of the Punjab · PKUniversity of Gujrat · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sucking insects require a surface of plants on which the legs and the eggs of insects will adhere and to which insect mouthparts will access. The primary plant protection against insects is their surface property, which hinders the attachment of the insect's legs and eggs. The epicuticular waxes chemistry influences the fine structure of the cuticular surface. In current study, an attempt was made to investigate the variation of chemical compounds in epicuticular waxes of four cotton species that classify them resistant or susceptible i.e., Gossypium abroreum, G. hirsutum, G. arboreum wax deficient mutant (GaWM3) and G. harknessi which were evaluated for their interaction with whitefly and CLCuV transmission. Gossypium hirsutum an insect and CLCuV susceptible cotton variety, was found to have four compounds namely Trichloroacetic acid, hexadecylester, P-xylenolpthalein, 2-cyclopentene-1-ol, 1-phenyl-and Phenol, 2,5-bis [1,1- dimethyl] which could interact with chitin of whitefly while only two compounds in Gossypium arboreum an insect and CLCuV resistant cotton variety could interact with chitin of whitefly. Similarly, GaWM3 and Gossypium harkasnessi were found to have only a single compound. Number of whiteflies found on leaves of G. hirsutum was much higher as compared to other cotton species. Keeping this fact in mind a wax biosynthetic gene CER3, from Arabidopsis thaliana was transformed into G. hirsutum and the plants were evaluated for their resistance against whitefly and CLCuV transmission. In microscopic analysis transgenic plants clearly showed higher amounts of leaf waxes as compared to non-transgenics. The least whitefly population and CLCuV titer of <10,000 units was found in transgenic plants compared to non-transgenic cotton where it was ≈4.5X106 units that confirmed the role of wax in insect interaction and ultimately to CLCuV transmission. This study provides novel insight on wax related compounds involved in cotton-whitefly interaction, which potentially can help in developing more efficient control strategies for this destructive pest.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ResistanceGene Expression Regulation, PlantGossypiumHemipteraPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedWaxesWaxes

Identifiers

PMID33945542
PMCPMC8096116
OpenAlexW3159735137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.