Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945539›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Ranking microbial metabolomic and genomic links in the NPLinker framework using complementary scoring functions.

Grímur Hjörleifsson Eldjárn, Andrew Ramsay, Justin J J van der Hooft, Katherine R Duncan, Sylvia Soldatou, Juho Rousu, Rónán Daly, Joe Wandy, Simon Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Primed for Discovery.Biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Grímur Hjörleifsson EldjárnSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9580-6685
Andrew RamsaySchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1451-8973
Justin J J van der HooftBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-5511
Katherine R DuncanStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3670-4849
Sylvia SoldatouSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-102X
Juho RousuDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0705-4314
Rónán DalyGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1275-6820
Joe WandyGlasgow Polyomics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-4664
Simon RogersSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R022054/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialised metabolites from microbial sources are well-known for their wide range of biomedical applications, particularly as antibiotics. When mining paired genomic and metabolomic data sets for novel specialised metabolites, establishing links between Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) and metabolites represents a promising way of finding such novel chemistry. However, due to the lack of detailed biosynthetic knowledge for the majority of predicted BGCs, and the large number of possible combinations, this is not a simple task. This problem is becoming ever more pressing with the increased availability of paired omics data sets. Current tools are not effective at identifying valid links automatically, and manual verification is a considerable bottleneck in natural product research. We demonstrate that using multiple link-scoring functions together makes it easier to prioritise true links relative to others. Based on standardising a commonly used score, we introduce a new, more effective score, and introduce a novel score using an Input-Output Kernel Regression approach. Finally, we present NPLinker, a software framework to link genomic and metabolomic data. Results are verified using publicly available data sets that include validated links.

Indexed as

SoftwareBiosynthetic PathwaysComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDatabases, GeneticData MiningGenetics, MicrobialGenome, MicrobialGenomicsMetabolomicsMicrobiological PhenomenaMultigene FamilyRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID33945539
PMCPMC8130963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.