Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945494›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

The Impact of Inpatient Telemedicine on Personal Protective Equipment Savings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study.

Reem Halabi, Geoffrey Smith, Marc Sylwestrzak, Brian Clay, Christopher A Longhurst, Lina Lander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reem HalabiSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9692-1709
Geoffrey SmithInformation Services, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3103-541X
Marc SylwestrzakInformation Services, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-8881
Brian ClayInformation Services, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5780-3459
Christopher A LonghurstInformation Services, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-6856
Lina LanderInformation Services, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6180-223X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and shortage of adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), hospitals implemented inpatient telemedicine measures to ensure operational readiness and a safe working environment for clinicians. The utility and sustainability of inpatient telemedicine initiatives need to be evaluated as the number of COVID-19 inpatients is expected to continue declining. In this viewpoint, we describe the use of a rapidly deployed inpatient telemedicine workflow at a large academic medical center and discuss the potential impact on PPE savings. In early 2020, videoconferencing software was installed on patient bedside iPads at two academic medical center teaching hospitals. An internal website allowed providers to initiate video calls with patients in any patient room with an activated iPad, including both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. Patients were encouraged to use telemedicine technology to connect with loved ones via native apps or videoconferencing software. We evaluated the use of telemedicine technology on patients' bedside iPads by monitoring traffic to the internal website. Between May 2020 and March 2021, there were a total of 1240 active users of the Video Visits website (mean 112.7, SD 49.0 connection events per month). Of these, 133 (10.7%) connections were made. Patients initiated 63 (47.4%) video calls with family or friends and sent 37 (27.8%) emails with videoconference connection instructions. Providers initiated a total of 33 (24.8%) video calls with the majority of calls initiated in August (n=22, 67%). There was a low level of adoption of inpatient telemedicine capability by providers and patients. With sufficient availability of PPE, inpatient providers did not find a frequent need to use the bedside telemedicine technology, despite a high census of patients with COVID-19. Compared to providers, patients used videoconferencing capabilities more frequently in September and October 2020. We did not find savings of PPE associated with the use of inpatient telemedicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsMalePandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV-2Telemedicinebedside iPadCOVID-19digital healthinpatient telemedicinepandemicpersonal protective equipmenttelehealthtelemedicinevideo visitsvirtual visits

Identifiers

PMID33945494
PMCPMC8136403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.