Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945300›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2021

Confronting Racism in Environmental Health Sciences: Moving the Science Forward for Eliminating Racial Inequities.

Devon C Payne-Sturges, Gilbert C Gee, Deborah A Cory-Slechta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Current approaches and advances in placental toxicology.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Short-Term Increases in NOEnvironmental science & technology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Approaching Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion in The Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience: Are we There Yet?Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Devon C Payne-SturgesMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Gilbert C GeeFielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Deborah A Cory-SlechtaUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, USA.

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martha Susiarjo · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Susan W Parker · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
Systems Science Approaches for Assessing Cumulative Impacts of Air Pollution and Psychosocial Stressors onNeurocognitive Outcomes Among ChildrenK01ES028266 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI PAYNE-STURGES, DEVON C · 2018 to 2020
$439k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES028266NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe twin pandemics of COVID-19 and systemic racism during 2020 have forced a conversation across many segments of our society, including the environmental health sciences (EHS) research community. We have seen the proliferation of statements of solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement and commitments to fight racism and health inequities from academia, nonprofit organizations, governmental agencies, and private corporations. Actions must now arise from these promises. As public health and EHS scientists, we must examine the systems that produce and perpetuate inequities in exposure to environmental pollutants and associated health effects.

objectivesWe outline five recommendations the EHS research community can implement to confront racism and move our science forward for eliminating racial inequities in environmental health. DISCUSSION: Race is best considered a political label that promotes inequality. Thus, we should be wary of equating race with biology. Further, EHS researchers should seriously consider racism as a plausible explanation of racial disparities in health and consider structural racism as a factor in environmental health risk/impact assessments, as well as multiple explanations for racial differences in environmental exposures and health outcomes. Last, the EHS research community should develop metrics to measure racism and a set of guidelines on the use and interpretation of race and ethnicity within the environmental sciences. Numerous guidelines exist in other disciplines that can serve as models. By taking action on each of these recommendations, we can make significant progress toward eliminating racial disparities. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP8186.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthRacismCOVID-19Health Status DisparitiesHumansRacial Groups

Identifiers

PMID33945300
PMCPMC8096378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.