Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945269›Full record

ArticleChemical reviews2021

Unsupervised Learning Methods for Molecular Simulation Data.

Aldo Glielmo, Brooke E Husic, Alex Rodriguez, Cecilia Clementi, Frank Noé, Alessandro Laio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unveiling hidden intermediate states in protein folding with AI-based conditional transition clustering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculations in Protein Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aldo GlielmoInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) 34014 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4737-2878
Brooke E HusicFreie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8020-3750
Alex RodriguezInternational Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Condensed Matter and Statistical Physics Section, 34100 Trieste, Italy.
Cecilia ClementiFreie Universität Berlin, Department for Physics, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-2358
Frank NoéFreie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Alessandro LaioInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) 34014 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9164-7907

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unsupervised learning is becoming an essential tool to analyze the increasingly large amounts of data produced by atomistic and molecular simulations, in material science, solid state physics, biophysics, and biochemistry. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the methods of unsupervised learning that have been most commonly used to investigate simulation data and indicate likely directions for further developments in the field. In particular, we discuss

Identifiers

PMID33945269
PMCPMC8391792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.