Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945218›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2021

Validation of accuracy deformable image registration contour propagation using a benchmark virtual HN phantom dataset.

Robert Boyd, Amar Basavatia, Wolfgang A Tomé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert BoydDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Amar BasavatiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-2653
Wolfgang A ToméDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1586-8091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual anatomic phantoms offer precise voxel mapping of the variation of anatomy with ground truth deformation vector fields (DVFs). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) are the standard metrics for evaluating geometric contour congruence when testing deformable registration (DIR) algorithms. A HN virtual patient phantom data set was used for a kVCT-kVCT automatic propagation contour validation study employing the Accuray DIR algorithm. Furthermore, since TomoTherapy uses MVCT images of the relevant anatomy for adaptive monitoring, the kVCT image data set quality was transformed to an MVCT image data set quality to study intermodal kVCT-MVCT DIR accuracy. The results of the study indicate that the Accuray DIR algorithm can be expected to autopropagate HN contours adequately, on average, within tolerances recommended by TG-132 (DSC 0.8-0.9, MDA within voxel width). However, contours critical to dosimetric planning should always be visually proofed for accuracy. Using standard reconstruction MVCT image quality causes slightly less, but acceptable, agreement with ground truth contours.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisteddeformable registrationkVCTMVCTregistration accuracyvirtual phantoms

Identifiers

PMID33945218
PMCPMC8130232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.