Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945208›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)2021

Glargine versus regular insulin protocol in feline diabetic ketoacidosis.

Florian K Zeugswetter, Nicole Luckschander-Zeller, Sonja Karlovits, Jaquie S Rand

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Glargine versus regular insulin protocol in feline diabetic ketoacidosis.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2021
    Article
  3. Rational approach to feline medical emergencies: part 2.Journal of feline medicine and surgery
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian K ZeugswetterUniversity Hospital for Small Animals of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-0375
Nicole Luckschander-ZellerUniversity Hospital for Small Animals of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Sonja KarlovitsUniversity Hospital for Small Animals of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Jaquie S RandSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Australia.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether basal-bolus administration of glargine insulin is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to the standard continuous rate infusion (CRI) protocol.

designProspective randomized clinical trial.

settingUniversity teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Twenty cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

interventionsThe cats were block-randomized to either a CRI protocol using regular insulin (CRI-group; n = 10) or a basal-bolus SC and IM glargine protocol (glargine-group, n = 10). Baseline blood gases, electrolytes, glucose, and β-hydroxybutyrate (β-OHB) concentrations were measured at the time of admission and later at predefined intervals until reaching the primary endpoint of the study, defined as a β-hydroxybutyrate concentration < 2.55 mmol/L. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe main outcome measure was time (h) to resolution of ketonemia. Secondary outcome measures were time until first improvement of hyperglycemia and ketonemia, decrease of glucose to ≤13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL), resolution of acidosis, consumption of first meal, and discharge from hospital. Additionally, occurrence of treatment-associated adverse events and death were compared. Seventeen cats (85%) survived to discharge, with no difference in survival between groups (P = 1.0). Median times to β-OHB < 2.55 mmol/L were 42 (CRI-group) and 30 (glargine-group) hours, respectively (P = 0.114). Median times to first improvement of hyperglycemia (glargine-group: 2 h; CRI-group: 6 h; P = 0.018) and until discharge from hospital (glargine-group: 140 h; CRI-group: 174 h; P = 0.033) were significantly shorter in the glargine-group. No significant differences were observed in any other parameter under investigation (P > 0.05).

conclusionsBasal-bolus administration of glargine insulin appears to be an effective and safe alternative to the current standard CRI-protocol for the management of DKA in cats. The positive outcomes and simplicity make it a viable option for the treatment of feline DKA.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDiabetic KetoacidosisHyperglycemiaAnimalsBlood GlucoseCatsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin GlargineProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Glarginediabetes mellitusintramuscularpotassiumsalineβ-hydroxybutyrate

Identifiers

PMID33945208
PMCPMC8360016
OpenAlexW3158717840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.