Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945200›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2021

Novel and emerging biotechnological crop protection approaches.

Gaetano Giudice, Loredana Moffa, Serena Varotto, Maria Francesca Cardone, Carlo Bergamini, Gabriella De Lorenzis, Riccardo Velasco, Luca Nerva, Walter Chitarra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA Satellites Impact Begomovirus Diseases in a Virus-Specific Manner.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Targeted genome editing in polyploids: lessons fromFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gaetano GiudiceResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Loredana MoffaResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Serena VarottoDepartment of Agronomy Animals Food Natural Resources and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
Maria Francesca CardoneResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Turi, BA, Italy.
Carlo BergaminiResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Turi, BA, Italy.
Gabriella De LorenzisDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences - Production, Landscape, Agroenergy (DiSAA), University of Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-1218
Riccardo VelascoResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Conegliano, TV, Italy.
Luca NervaResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Conegliano, TV, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5009-5798
Walter ChitarraResearch Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA-VE), Conegliano, TV, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-3794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional breeding or genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have for a long time been the sole approaches to effectively cope with biotic and abiotic stresses and implement the quality traits of crops. However, emerging diseases as well as unpredictable climate changes affecting agriculture over the entire globe force scientists to find alternative solutions required to quickly overcome seasonal crises. In this review, we first focus on cisgenesis and genome editing as challenging biotechnological approaches for breeding crops more tolerant to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, we take into consideration a toolbox of new techniques based on applications of RNA interference and epigenome modifications, which can be adopted for improving plant resilience. Recent advances in these biotechnological applications are mainly reported for non-model plants and woody crops in particular. Indeed, the characterization of RNAi machinery in plants is fundamental to transform available information into biologically or biotechnologically applicable knowledge. Finally, here we discuss how these innovative and environmentally friendly techniques combined with traditional breeding can sustain a modern agriculture and be of potential contribution to climate change mitigation.

Indexed as

Crop ProtectionPlant BreedingCrops, AgriculturalGene EditingPlants, Genetically Modifiedabiotic stresscisgenesisdisease resilienceDNA methylationepigeneticsgenome editingnew plant breeding techniquesRNA interference

Identifiers

PMID33945200
PMCPMC8384607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.