ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2021
Dead or alive: microbial viability treatment reveals both active and inactive bacterial constituents in the fish gut microbiota.
Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphological Differences in Feeding and Digestive Organs, the Diversity of Intestinal Microorganisms, and Variations in Digestive Enzyme Activity Promote the Differentiation of Nutritional Niches in Schizothoracinae Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Seasonal and spatial dynamics of the intestinal microbiome in tropical freshwater fish: insights from Astyanax aeneus and Brycon costaricensis in the Peñas Blancas river basin, Costa Rica.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- DNA from non-viable bacteria biases diversity estimates in the corals Acropora loripes and Pocillopora acuta.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Structural differences in the gut microbiome of bats using terrestrial vs. aquatic feeding resources.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Effect of in vitro cultivation on human gut microbiota composition using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and metabolomics approach.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Feed microbiome: confounding factor affecting fish gut microbiome studies.ISME communications · 2022Article
- You are more than what you eat: potentially adaptive enrichment of microbiome functions across bat dietary niches.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study evaluated the microbial viability of fish gut microbiota in both digesta (faecal) and mucosal samples using a modified propidium monoazide (PMA) protocol, followed by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. METHODS AND
resultsDigesta and gut mucosal samples from farmed yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi) were collected and a modified PMA treatment was applied prior to DNA extraction to differentiate both active and nonviable microbial cells in the samples. All samples were then sequenced using a standard 16S rRNA approach. The digesta and mucosal samples contained significantly different bacterial communities, with a higher diversity observed in digesta samples. In addition, PMA treatment significantly reduced the microbial diversity and richness of digesta and mucosal samples and depleted bacterial constituents typically considered to be important within fish, such as Lactobacillales and Clostridales taxa.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that important bacterial members may not be active in the fish gut microbiota. In particular, several beneficial lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were identified as nonviable bacterial cells, potentially influencing the functional potential of the fish microbiota. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACTS OF THE STUDY: Standardizing the methods for characterizing the fish microbiota are paramount in order to compare studies. In this study, we showed that both sample type and PMA treatment influence the bacterial communities found in the fish gut microbiota. Our findings also suggest that several microbes previously described in the fish gut may not be active constituents. As a result, these factors should be considered in future studies to better evaluate the active bacterial communities associated with the host.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.