Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945087›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Assessment of accuracy of an imageless hand-held robotic-assisted system in component positioning in total knee replacement: a prospective study.

Narendra Vaidya, Tanmay N Jaysingani, Taufiq Panjwani, Rakesh Patil, Ajinkya Deshpande, Abhinav Kesarkar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Narendra VaidyaDepartment of Orthopedics, Lokmanya Hospital, Nigdi, Pradhikaran, Pune, India.
Tanmay N JaysinganiDepartment of Orthopedics, Lokmanya Hospital, Nigdi, Pradhikaran, Pune, India. tanmayjaysingani@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-8699
Taufiq PanjwaniDepartment of Orthopedics, Lokmanya Hospital, Nigdi, Pradhikaran, Pune, India.
Rakesh PatilDepartment of Orthopedics, Lokmanya Hospital, Nigdi, Pradhikaran, Pune, India.
Ajinkya DeshpandeDepartment of Orthopedics, Lokmanya Hospital, Nigdi, Pradhikaran, Pune, India.
Abhinav KesarkarDepartment of Orthopedics, Lokmanya Hospital, Nigdi, Pradhikaran, Pune, India.
Niramaya Hospital · INZ.V.M.Unani Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, robotic technology is becoming more pervasive in joint arthroplasty. The role of robotics in joint replacement surgery is to bring precision and accuracy in bone preparation, implant positioning and soft tissue balancing. However, there is yet to be a study conducted to determine the accuracy of bone preparation done by a new robotic system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and report on the accuracy of bone cuts using imageless semiautonomous freehand robotic sculpting system, Navio (Smith & Nephew) based on the data provided by the robotic system. Between August 2018 and May 2019, a total of 62 patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. All surgeries were done by the senior author using a medial para-patellar approach and using a posterior stabilised implant (Anthem, Smith & Nephew Inc.). The study included 37 female patients and 25 male patients. The parameters assessed in this study were: (1) mechanical axis, (2) femoral coronal alignment, (3) femoral rotation, (4) femoral sagittal alignment, (5) tibial slope and (6) tibial coronal alignment using paired t test and root mean squared error (RMSE). The robotic system was accurate in achieving the bone cuts as planned in mechanical axis alignment (p = 0.89, RMSE = 0.56), femoral coronal alignment (p = 0.36, RMSE = 0.36), femoral sagittal alignment (p = 0.10, RMSE = 0.44), femoral rotation (p = 0.91, RMSE = 0.11), tibial coronal alignment (p = 0.81, RMSE = 0.24) and tibial slope (p = 0.30, RMSE = 0.37) with the maximum RMSE being 0.56. This study demonstrated that semi-autonomous hand-held robotic system, Navio (Smith & Nephew) for total knee arthroplasty produced accurate component positioning as per plan in all planes. The maximum RMSE was 0.56°.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleFemurHumansMaleProspective StudiesTibiaAccuracyAlignmentImplant positioningNAVIORobotic total knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID33945087
OpenAlexW3158994205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.