ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
Imagined character recognition through EEG signals using deep convolutional neural network.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Deep Learning Framework for EEG-Based Decoding of Visually Imagined Arrows with Different Colors and Directions.Biosensors · 2026Article
- A low-latency neural inference framework for real-time handwriting recognition from EEG signals on an edge device.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ThinkSTra: a transformer-driven architecture for decoding imagined speech from EEG with spatial-temporal dynamics.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Imagined speech classification exploiting EEG power spectrum features.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Channel attention convolutional aggregation network based on video-level features for EEG emotion recognition.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Temporal-spatial cross attention network for recognizing imagined characters.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Continuous versus discrete robotic feedback for brain-computer interfaces aimed for neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- A State-of-the-Art Review of EEG-Based Imagined Speech Decoding.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- A Quantized Convolutional Neural Network Implemented With Memristor for Image Denoising and Recognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain computer interface (BCI) enables people to interact directly with computing devices through their brain signals. A BCI typically interprets EEG signals to reflect the user's intent or other mental activity. Motor imagery (MI) is a commonly used technique in BCIs where a user is asked to imagine moving certain part of the body such as a hand or a foot. By correctly interpreting the signal, one can perform a multitude of tasks such as controlling wheel chair, playing computer games, or even typing text. However, the use of motor-imagery-based BCIs outside the laboratory environment is limited due to the lack of their reliability. This work focuses on another kind of mental imagery, namely, the visual imagery (VI). VI is the manipulation of visual information that comes from memory. This work presents a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based system for the recognition of visual/mental imagination of English alphabets so as to enable typing directly via brain signals. The DCNN learns to extract the spatial features hidden in the EEG signal. As opposed to many deep neural networks that use raw EEG signals for classification, this work transforms the raw signals into band powers using Morlet wavelet transformation. The proposed approach is evaluated on two publicly available benchmark MI-EEG datasets and a visual imagery dataset specifically collected for this work. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed model performs better than the existing state-of-the-art methods for MI-EEG classification and yields an average accuracy of 99.45% on the two public MI-EEG datasets. The model also achieves an average recognition rate of 95.2% for the 26 English-language alphabets. Overall working of the proposed solution for imagined character recognition through EEG signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33945075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.