ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2022
Methods to determine the affinity of heavy metals for the chemically extracted carrier phases in soils.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Special issue on "Soil and plant contamination and remediation, Part 2".Environmental geochemistry and health · 2022Article
- Integrated Assessment of Affinity to Chemical Fractions and Environmental Pollution with Heavy Metals: A New Approach Based on Sequential Extraction Results.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A new index is proposed to determine the affinity of heavy metals (HM) to their carrier phases (AHM-fraction), which, in contrast to the traditional index CHM = 100 CHM-fraction/CHM-soil, considers the sum of all metals in the fraction as a share of the bulk content of all HM in the soil. The metal has affinity for the given phase if AHM-fraction > 1; vice versa, the affinity is absent if AHM-fraction < 1. Comparison of the affinity series of metals for a certain phase based on two indices revealed their discrepancy in most cases. The new index can take into consideration the discrepancy in affinity of the given metal for phases extracted by different strength reagents. The effect of the new indicator was tested on several contaminated soils: Haplic Chernozem, Stagnic Phaeozems, and Calcaric Fluvic Arenosol, as well as on two Spolic Technosols. Compared with the index CHM, the results of the new analysis of contaminated soils with the ATM fraction demonstrated that the Zn content in Calcaric Fluvic Arenosol is decreased considerably due to its low buffer capacity. Since the content of organic matter in Calcaric Fluvic Arenosol is insignificant, only organophile elements, such as Cu and Pb, can make up complexes with organic ligands, in contrast to the fixation of Ni and Mn by organic matter in Chernozems. Due to the low buffering capacity of Calcaric Fluvic Arenosol, the mobile forms of Cd and Zn increased, and these forms of Cr decreased. Therefore, the low buffering soil cannot fix Cd and Zn. Increase in contamination in Spolic Technosols (approximate permissible concentration, APC > 5) as compared to the index CHM, the value of the AHM-fraction of metals in the residue (except for cadmium) increased. In addition, the share of Pb and Cu increases in the organic matter. Thus, the use of a new indicator-the affinity of heavy metals to the carrier phases showed their advantage over the traditional index CHM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33945057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.