Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33945041›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2021

Simultaneous Recording of Motor Evoked Potentials in Hand, Wrist and Arm Muscles to Assess Corticospinal Divergence.

Stacey L DeJong, Jayden A Bisson, Warren G Darling, Richard K Shields

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of a Brain Navigator to Identify the Precentral Knob of the Precentral Gyrus in Normal Subjects.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey L DeJongDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. stacey-dejong@uiowa.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6929-5693
Jayden A BissonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Warren G DarlingDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9928-2922
Richard K ShieldsDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-9317
University of Iowa · US

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
University of Iowa - Research 3T MRI Connectome UpgradeS10OD025025 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAGNOTTA, VINCENT A · 2018 to 2018
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931NIH HHS S10 OD025025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to further develop methods to assess corticospinal divergence and muscle coupling using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Ten healthy right-handed adults participated (7 females, age 34.0 ± 12.9 years). Monophasic single pulses were delivered to 14 sites over the right primary motor cortex at 40, 60, 80 and 100% of maximum stimulator output (MSO), using MRI-based neuronavigation. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded simultaneously from 9 muscles of the contralateral hand, wrist and arm. For each intensity, corticospinal divergence was quantified by the average number of muscles that responded to TMS per cortical site, coactivation across muscle pairs as reflected by overlap of cortical representations, and correlation of MEP amplitudes across muscle pairs. TMS to each muscle's most responsive site elicited submaximal MEPs in most other muscles. The number of responsive muscles per cortical site and the extent of coactivation increased with increasing intensity (ANOVA, p < 0.001). In contrast, correlations of MEP amplitudes did not differ across the 60, 80 and 100% MSO intensities (ANOVA, p = 0.34), but did differ across muscle pairs (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis identified 4 sets of muscle pairs (Tukey homogenous subsets, p < 0.05). Correlations were highest for pairs involving two hand muscles and lowest for pairs that included an upper arm muscle. Correlation of MEP amplitudes may quantify varying levels of muscle coupling. In future studies, this approach may be a biomarker to reveal altered coupling induced by neural injury, neural repair and/or motor learning.

Indexed as

ArmEvoked Potentials, MotorAdultElectromyographyFemaleHandHumansMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationWristYoung AdultCoactivationCortical mappingMotor evoked potentialMuscle couplingSynergyTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33945041
PMCPMC8858648
OpenAlexW3157535451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.