ArticleJAMA network open2021
Correlation Between Changes in Brand-Name Drug Prices and Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Out-of-Pocket Spending for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar Competition for Medicare Patients.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Changes in Medicare Part D Plan Designs After the Inflation Reduction Act.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Article
- What drug characteristics explain the wide range of manufacturer rebates?Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Association between changes in prices and out-of-pocket costs for brand-name clinician-administered drugs.Health services research · 2024Article
- Choice intention for the national volume-based procurement drug and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study on patients with late-life depression in China.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Lessons From Insulin: Policy Prescriptions for Affordable Diabetes and Obesity Medications.Diabetes care · 2024Review
- Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar Competition.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Market dynamics of authorized generics in Medicaid from 2014 to 2020.Health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Pharmacy and neighborhood-level variation in cash price of diabetes medications in the United States.PloS one · 2023Article
- Impact of list price changes on out-of-pocket costs and adherence in four high-rebate specialty drugs.PloS one · 2023Article
- Effects of Real-time Prescription Benefit Recommendations on Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Trends in Prices of Drugs Used to Treat Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US From 2015 to 2020.JAMA network open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: List prices set by manufacturers for brand-name prescription drugs in the US have been increasing faster than inflation, although confidential manufacturer rebates offset some of these increases. Most commercially insured patients pay at least some out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs, and higher patient spending is associated with lower adherence and worse health outcomes. Objective: To examine whether price changes for brand-name drugs are correlated with changes in patient out-of-pocket spending and whether this association varies by insurance benefit design. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study of 79 brand-name drugs with available pricing data from January 2015 to December 2017 was conducted, with data obtained from a national commercial insurance claims database. Exposures: Change in the list prices set by manufacturers and estimated net prices after rebates among non-Medicaid payers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in median out-of-pocket spending among all patients and stratified by insurance pharmacy benefit design, including high-deductible insurance plans and plans with any amount of deductibles or coinsurance. Results: Among 79 drugs, median increases were 16.7% (interquartile range [IQR], 13.6%-21.1%) for list prices, 5.4% (IQR, -3.9% to 11.7%) for net prices, and 3.5% (IQR, 1.4%-9.1%) for out-of-pocket spending from 2015 to 2017. Changes in list prices were correlated with changes in net prices (r = 0.34; P = .002). Overall, changes in out-of-pocket spending were not correlated with changes in list prices (r = 0.14; P = .22) or net prices (r = 0.04; P = .71). Among 53.7% of patients who paid any drug deductible or coinsurance, median out-of-pocket spending increased by 15.0%, and changes were moderately correlated with changes in list prices (r = 0.38; P = .001) but not net prices (r = 0.06; P = .62). Conclusions and Relevance: Some commercially insured patients who pay only prescription drug copayments appear to be insulated from increases in drug prices. However, more than half of patients pay deductibles or coinsurance and may experience substantial increases in out-of-pocket spending when drug prices increase. Among these patients, there was no evidence that manufacturer rebates to insurers are associated with patients' out-of-pocket spending. Policies to rein in unregulated annual increases in list prices for brand-name drugs may have important consequences for patient out-of-pocket spending.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.