Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33944876›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring vs Standard Therapy During Infliximab Induction on Disease Remission in Patients With Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Silje Watterdal Syversen, Guro Løvik Goll, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen, Øystein Sandanger, Joseph Sexton, Inge Christoffer Olsen, Johanna Elin Gehin, David John Warren, Marthe Kirkesæther Brun, Rolf Anton Klaasen and 23 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03074656 (A NORwegian Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of Tailoring Infliximab Treatment by Therapeutic DRUg Monitoring - The NOR-DRUM Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03074656 nacompletednot on this map

A NORwegian Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effectiveness of Tailoring Infliximab Treatment by Therapeutic DRUg Monitoring - The NOR-DRUM Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiakonhjemmet HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled611ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis, Spondyloarthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Crohn DiseaseArmsTherapeutic drug monitoring, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Infliximab for medical induction of remission in Crohn's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Silje Watterdal SyversenDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Guro Løvik GollDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kristin Kaasen JørgensenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Øystein SandangerSection of Dermatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Joseph SextonDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Inge Christoffer OlsenDepartment of Research Support for Clinical Trials, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Johanna Elin GehinDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
David John WarrenDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Marthe Kirkesæther BrunDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rolf Anton KlaasenDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Normann KarlsenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Geir NorabergDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Arendal, Norway.
Camilla ZettelDepartment of Rheumatology, Betanien Hospital, Skien, Norway.
Maud Kristine Aga LjosåDepartment of Rheumatology, Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway.
Anne Julsrud HaugenDepartment of Rheumatology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Moss, Norway.
Rune Johan NjållaDepartment of Rheumatology, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.
Trude Jannecke BruunDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kathrine Aglen SeebergDepartement of Gastroenterology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Brigitte MichelsenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of Southern Norway Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Eldri Kveine StrandLillehammer Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Lillehammer, Norway.
Svanaug SkorpeHaugesund Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Haugesund, Norway.
Ingrid Marianne BlomgrenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fonna Hospital Trust, Haugesund, Norway.
Yngvill Hovde BragnesDepartment of Rheumatology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Christian Kvikne DotterudDepartment of Dermatology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Turid ThuneDepartment of Dermatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Carl Magnus YstrømDepartment of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Elverum, Norway.
Roald TorpDepartment of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Hamar, Norway.
Pawel MielnikDepartment of Neurology, Rheumatology, and Physical Medicine, Førde Hospital Trust, Førde, Norway.
Cato MørkAkershus Dermatology Center, Lørenskog, Norway.
Tore K KvienDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jørgen JahnsenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Nils BolstadDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Espen A HaavardsholmDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Diakonhjemmet Hospital · NOOslo University Hospital · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOHospital of Southern Norway · NOInnlandet Hospital Trust · NONordland Hospital Trust · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOÅlesund Hospital · NOBetanien Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOHelse Førde · NOØstfold Hospital Trust · NOPrivatsykehuset Haugesund · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOSykehuset i Vestfold · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), defined as individualized drug dosing based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels, has been proposed as an alternative to standard therapy to maximize efficacy and safety of infliximab and other biological drugs. However, whether proactive TDM improves clinical outcomes when implemented at the time of drug initiation, compared with standard therapy, remains unclear. Objective: To assess whether TDM during initiation of infliximab therapy improves treatment efficacy compared with standard infliximab therapy without TDM. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial of 411 adults with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, or psoriasis initiating infliximab therapy in 21 hospitals in Norway. Patients were recruited from March 1, 2017, to January 10, 2019. Final follow-up occurred on November 5, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive proactive TDM with dose and interval adjustments based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies (TDM group; n = 207) or standard infliximab therapy without drug and antibody level monitoring (standard therapy group; n = 204). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was clinical remission at week 30. Results: Among 411 randomized patients (mean age, 44.7 [SD, 14.9] years; 209 women [51%]), 398 (198 in the TDM group and 200 in the standard therapy group) received their randomized intervention and were included in the full analysis set. Clinical remission at week 30 was achieved in 100 (50.5%) of 198 and 106 (53.0%) of 200 patients in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 1.5%; 95% CI, -8.2% to 11.1%; P = .78). Adverse events were reported in 135 patients (68%) and 139 patients (70%) in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases initiating treatment with infliximab, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring, compared with standard therapy, did not significantly improve clinical remission rates over 30 weeks. These findings do not support routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab induction for improving disease remission rates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03074656.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultArthritisChronic DiseaseDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyInflammatory Bowel DiseasesInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedPsoriasisRemission InductionStandard of CareInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID33944876
PMCPMC8097498
OpenAlexW3157525851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.