Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33944619›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2021

Production Processes for Creating Educational Videos.

Stephanie Castillo, Karisa Calvitti, Jeffery Shoup, Madison Rice, Helen Lubbock, Kendra H Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie CastilloCommunication of Science and Technology Program, College of Arts and Science.
Karisa CalvittiDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
Jeffery ShoupBasic Sciences, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232.
Madison RiceBiomedical Visualization, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607.
Helen LubbockDepartment of Teaching and Learning, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232.
Kendra H OliverCommunication of Science and Technology Program, College of Arts and Science.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asynchronous video-based educational resources allow for increased course material engagement. In today's climate, educators are encouraged to create videos for online instruction but are typically given limited production guidance. Few formal resources exist to guide educators for high-quality video production in a non-studio setting. This article is a how-to guide for producing videos using widely available primary resources through three steps: preproduction, production, and postproduction. During preproduction, educators consider style and project scope, including the "what, how, and why" of the content. For production, we have provided information on the set, light, sounds, and video equipment needed for optimizing video production in a non-studio setting. Finally, during postproduction, the educator considers how to combine and edit the video as well as organize content. Overall, this article is an approachable guide to help educators begin their low-budget video-production journeys.

Indexed as

StudentsHumansVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID33944619
PMCPMC8734383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.