ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2021
Top Ten Tips Palliative Clinicians Should Know About Evidence-Based Advocacy.
Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Hospice Live Discharge.Journal of palliative medicine · 2025Article
- The legal needs of people receiving palliative care in Uganda: A multi-method assessment to advance universal health coverage.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Measuring palliative care integration in Malawi through service provision, access, and training indicators: the Waterloo Coalition Initiative.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Palliative Justice Post-COP27.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023Review
- Can You Hear Us Now? Equity in Global Advocacy for Palliative Care.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2022Article
- The 2nd Annual US Celebration of World Hospice and Palliative Care Day: A virtual coming together to support equity in palliative care access.Palliative & supportive care · 2022Article
- American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel consensus statement on nursing's roles in ensuring universal palliative care access.Nursing outlookArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering makes the need for funded policies that integrate palliative care (PC) into the continuum of services more urgent than ever. Palliative specialists are uniquely positioned to merge their clinical expertise with empirical evidence to advocate for improved PC delivery. There is a vital feedback loop between advocacy and clinical practice that palliative specialists can leverage to influence key stakeholders and decision makers and bridge PC policy deficits. Sustained interdisciplinary partnerships are critical to evidence-based PC advocacy that addresses resource gaps, social injustice, and unmet and disparate needs. Although PC advocacy may appear optional or even frivolous at times, it is an essential skill for any practitioner working to improve care for seriously ill individuals and their families. This article highlights 10 pragmatic tips that palliative specialists can use to advocate for policy changes that enhance PC access and equity at institutional, local, national, and global levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.