ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2021
Can malleable penile prosthesis implantation improve voiding dysfunction in men with concurrent erectile dysfunction and buried penis?
Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update on penile prosthesis.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Review
- Safety outcomes of the first Rigi10™ malleable penile prostheses implanted worldwide.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Clinical recommendations on penile reconstructive and prosthetic surgery: a consensus statement from the Asia-Pacific Society of Sexual Medicine.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA buried penis causes voiding dysfunction and limits penetrative sexual intercourse. This pilot study evaluates the urinary outcomes in men with buried penis following insertion of malleable penile implants. MATERIALS AND
methodsMen with buried penis and co-existing urinary problems and erectile dysfunction underwent malleable penile prosthesis implantation were reviewed in a prospective ethics approved database. Patient demographics, flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score, Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) and overall satisfaction score (on a 5-point scale) were recorded.
resultsA total of 12 men (age 55 to 72 years) were reviewed, and the average gain in penile length post-implant, as measured from the pubis to the tip of the glans penis, was 6.8 (3 to 8) cm. There was a significant improvement in IIEF-5 score (8.2 vs. 22.5; p=0.029) post-implant, and more than half of patients were able to resume normal sexual intercourse and positive SEP-2 and SEP-4 were reported in 9 (75%) and 8 (67%) patients. There were no significant intraoperative or postoperative complication. Significant improvement in Qmax (8.4 ml/s vs. 18.6 ml/s; p=0.042) and IPSS (24.5±5.5 vs 15.5±3.5; p=0.038) were observed. More than two-thirds (83%) reported PGI-I score at 1 or 2, while 9 (75%) patients scored a 5/5 in overall satisfaction rate.
conclusionsMalleable penile implants increases penile length and improves urinary function in a highly select group of men with a buried penis and erectile dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.