ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2021
A novel EDAR missense mutation identified by whole-exome sequencing with non-syndromic tooth agenesis in a Chinese family.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exonic and IntronicDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Main genetic entities associated with tooth agenesis.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Review
- Identification of novel candidate genes associated with non-syndromic tooth agenesis in Mongolian families.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Genotype-phenotype pattern analysis of pathogenicFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Novel PAX9 compound heterozygous variants in a Chinese family with non-syndromic oligodontia and genotype-phenotype analysis of PAX9 variants.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2023Article
- The EDA/EDAR/NF-κB pathway in non-syndromic tooth agenesis: A genetic perspective.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- RNA Sequencing Analysis Reveals Divergent Adaptive Response to Hypo- and Hyper-Salinity in Greater Amberjack (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCausative variants in genes of the EDA/EDAR/NF-κB pathway, such as EDA and EDARADD, have been widely identified in patients with non-syndromic tooth agenesis (NSTA). However, few cases of NSTA are due to ectodysplasin-A receptor (EDAR) variants. In this study, we investigated NSTA-associated variants in Chinese families.
methodsPeripheral blood samples were collected from the family members of 24 individuals with NSTA for DNA extraction. The coding region of the EDA gene of the 24 probands was amplified by PCR and sequenced to investigate new variants. Whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing were then performed for probands without EDA variants detected by PCR.
resultsA novel missense variant EDAR c.338G>A (p.(Cys113Tyr)) was identified in one family. In addition, three known EDA variants (c.865C>T, c.866G>A, and c.1013C>T) were identified in three families. Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis of EDAR gene mutation showed that NSTA patients were most likely to lose the maxillary lateral incisors and the maxillary central incisors were the least affected. The phenotype of mutations at codon 289 of EDA in NSTA affected patients was characterized by lateral incisors loss, rarely affecting the maxillary first molars.
conclusionA novel EDAR missense variant c.338G>A (p.(Cys113Tyr)) was identified in a family with NSTA, extending the mutation spectrum of the EDAR gene. Genotype-phenotype correlation analyses of EDAR and EDA mutations could help to improve disease status prediction in NSTA families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.