ArticleESC heart failure2021
Women with peripartum cardiomyopathy have normal ejection fraction, but abnormal systolic strain, during pregnancy.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myocardial function recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: the role of global longitudinal strain and myocardial work.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of High-Risk Pregnancy on Peripartum Left Ventricular Function.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Peripartum HFpEF: Identification of a Novel Phenotype and the Need for Cardio-Obstetrics Management.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Pathophysiology and risk factors of peripartum cardiomyopathy.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- Animal Models of Cardiovascular Complications of Pregnancy.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Dyspnea in pregnancy might be related to the incomplete physiological adaptation of the heart.Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research · 2022Article
- Women with peripartum cardiomyopathy have normal ejection fraction, but abnormal systolic strain, during pregnancy.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We report a case series of six women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) who incidentally underwent echocardiography prior to the clinical presentation of PPCM. For comparison, we identified controls, matched 2:1 on age, race, body mass index, gestational age, and hypertensive disorder. Among the six cases, all were diagnosed with PPCM during the post-partum period. Pre-PPCM echocardiograms were performed between 17.7 weeks of gestation and 13 days post-partum. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and size were normal and similar to the 12 matched controls (60% ± 6.6% vs. 61.4% ± 6.3%, P = 0.63) or left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (4.6 cm ± 0.2 cm vs. 4.5 cm ± 0.4 cm, P = 0.689). There was a trend towards a less negative (more abnormal) mean global longitudinal strain in cases compared with controls (-14% ± 4% vs. -18.3% ± 4.5%, P = 0.0658). Mean global circumferential strain was significantly less negative (more abnormal) in cases compared with controls (-21.5% ± 5% vs. -29.3% ± 7.6%, P = 0.0329). We conclude that women who develop PPCM have normal left ventricular ejection fraction during gestation preceding PPCM, indicating that the disease develops acutely in the peripartum period. Abnormal strain can be detected, however, suggesting that strain imaging could represent a screening method in populations at high risk for PPCM if confirmed in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.