Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942939›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2021

Prevalence of distress, its associated factors and referral to support services in people with cancer.

Deborah Kirk, Istvan Kabdebo, Lisa Whitehead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virtual Therapy Complementary Prehabilitation of Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer-A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The psychological distress of gastrointestinal cancer patients and its association with quality of life among different genders.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deborah KirkSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2992-3389
Istvan KabdeboSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-619X
Lisa WhiteheadSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-0279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo (i) characterise prevalence of distress amongst people diagnosed with cancer, (ii) determine factors associated with increasing distress, (iii) describe reported problems for those with clinically significant distress and (iv) investigate the factors associated with referral to support services.

backgroundInternational studies report a high prevalence of clinically significant distress in people with cancer. Australian studies are notably lacking. Additionally, clinicians still do not fully understand the factors associated with cancer-related distress.

designPeriod prevalence study.

methodsDistress screening data were analysed for 1,071 people accessing the Cancer Council Western Australia information and support line between 01/01/2016-31/12/2018. These data included people's demographics, cancer diagnoses, level of distress, reported problems and the service to which they were referred. Distress and reported problems were measured using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List. A partial proportional logistic regression model was constructed to determine which factors were associated with increasing levels of distress. Standard binary logistic regression models were used to investigate factors associated with referral to support services. The STROBE checklist was followed.

resultsPrevalence of clinically significant distress was high. Self-reported depression, sadness, worry and a lack of control over treatment decisions were significantly associated with increasing distress. Emotional problems were the most prevalent problems for people with clinically significant distress. Most people were referred to emotional health services, with depression, fatigue, living regionally and higher socioeconomic status associated with referral.

conclusionsEmotional problems such as depression, sadness and worry are associated with increasing levels of distress. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Not all factors associated with referral to support services were those associated with increasing levels of distress. This suggests that other factors may be more influential to referral decisions.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsStress, PsychologicalAustraliaHumansPrevalenceReferral and ConsultationAustraliacancer survivorscross-sectional studieslogistic modelsoncology nursingpsychological distressreferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID33942939
PMCPMC8453497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.