ArticleNursing open2021
A qualitative study on shared decision-making of patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Shared decision-making process and its influencing factors among patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Choosing Dialysis Modalities for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Review
- Navigating decisional conflict: laser peripheral iridotomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma prevention.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study to Investigate the Preference of Older Individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea on a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Machine in Thailand: An Outpatient Setting.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Article
- Shared decision-making in end-of-life care for end-stage renal disease patients: nephrologists' views and attitudes.Israel journal of health policy research · 2024Article
- Alignment Among Patient, Caregiver, and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Hemodialysis Vascular Access Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023Article
- A qualitative study on shared decision-making of patients with chronic kidney disease.Nursing open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to explore the change process among chronic kidney disease patients in shared decision-making.
designQualitative research is the design applied.
methodOriginal transcripts from an earlier study involving a purposive sample of 31 patients with chronic kidney disease provided a source of information. The data collection was conducted from August 2017-January 2018. Data analysis applied the thematic analysis method.
resultsThree themes were identified: from avoidance to being forced to accept, decision-making process of action and facilitating factors. After making the psychological adjustments necessary for undergoing dialysis treatment, participants experience the process of decision-making action. The improvement of knowledge and ability increases the patient's self-determination consciousness and strengthens confidence in decision-making. The nurse and the patient's family are both important facilitating factors, and they assist through the entire SDM process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.