Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942560›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2021

A Single Supratherapeutic Dose of Atogepant Does Not Affect Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Adults: Results From a Randomized, Single-Dose, Phase 1 Crossover Trial.

Ramesh Boinpally, Brian McNamee, Li Yao, Matthew Butler, Danielle McGeeney, Lisa Borbridge, Antonia Periclou

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mass Balance and Metabolism ofClinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Update on gepants for the treatment of chronic migraine.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024
    Review
  5. Update of Gepants in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  6. A Brief Review of Gepants.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Gepants - a long way to cure: a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramesh BoinpallyAbbVie, Madison, New Jersey, USA.
Brian McNameeAbbVie, Marlow, UK.
Li YaoAbbVie, Irvine, California, USA.
Matthew ButlerAbbVie, Madison, New Jersey, USA.
Danielle McGeeneyAbbVie, Madison, New Jersey, USA.
Lisa BorbridgeAbbVie, Irvine, California, USA.
Antonia PericlouAbbVie, Madison, New Jersey, USA.
AbbVie (United States) · USAbbVie (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atogepant is a selective, oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist in development for preventive treatment of migraine. This randomized, double-blind, phase 1 crossover study evaluated the cardiac repolarization effect of a single supratherapeutic (300 mg) atogepant dose vs placebo in healthy adults. Moxifloxacin 400 mg was the open-label active control. The primary end point was a change from baseline in Fridericia-corrected QT intervals (ΔQTcF). Sixty participants were randomized to atogepant 300 mg, placebo, and moxifloxacin; 59 (98.3%) completed all interventions. Assay sensitivity was confirmed: lower 90% confidence interval limit for QTcF interval change from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) for moxifloxacin was >5 millisecond vs placebo at prespecified 2-, 3-, and 4-hour time points. Following single-dose atogepant 300 mg, mean atogepant ΔΔQTcF and upper 90% confidence interval limits were lower than the 10-millisecond threshold at all time points. Atogepant mean peak plasma concentration was 3197 ng/mL, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t was 16 640 ng • h/mL, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours was 16 607 ng • h/mL, and median time to peak plasma concentration was 2.1 hours. The incidence of adverse events was low; no serious adverse events or elevations of liver enzymes were reported. Overall, a single supratherapeutic dose of atogepant was safe and did not impact cardiac repolarization in healthy participants.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArea Under CurveCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleMoxifloxacinPiperidinesPyridinesPyrrolesSpiro CompoundsatogepantCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMoxifloxacinPiperidinesPyridinesPyrrolesSpiro Compoundsatogepantcalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonistcardiac repolarizationmigraine disordersthorough QT study

Identifiers

PMID33942560
PMCPMC8453716
OpenAlexW3158822099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.