Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942506›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2022

A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of a novel autologous, heterogeneous skin construct in the treatment of Wagner one diabetic foot ulcers: Interim analysis.

David G Armstrong, Dennis P Orgill, Robert Galiano, Paul M Glat, Lawrence Didomenico, Alexander Reyzelman, Robert Snyder, William W Li, Marissa Carter, Charles M Zelen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

David G ArmstrongDepartment of Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dennis P OrgillDivision of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Robert GalianoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Paul M GlatDrexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lawrence DidomenicoLower Extremity Institute of Research and Therapy, Youngstown, Ohio, USA.
Alexander ReyzelmanCenter for Clinical Research, San Francisco, California, USA.
Robert SnyderClinical Research Barry University SPM, Brand Research Center, Barry University, Miami, Florida, USA.
William W LiThe Angiogenesis Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Marissa CarterStrategic Solutions, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Charles M ZelenDepartment of Medical Education, The Professional Education and Research Institute (PERI), Roanoke, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-7056
Angiogenesis Foundation · USBarry University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USDrexel University · USNorthwestern University · USProfessional Education and Research Institute · USStrategic Solutions Consulting (United States) · USUniversity of Southern California · USYoungstown State University · US

Funding

Improving the science of adherence reinforcement and safe mobility in people with diabetic foot ulcers using smart offloadingR01DK124789 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARMSTRONG, DAVID GEORGE, NAJAFI, BIJAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Infrared Eyes(iREyes)R44DK102244 · NIDDK · EDEN MEDICAL, INC. · PI ARMSTRONG, DAVID GEORGE, SCHOESS, JEFFREY NORMAN · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124789NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK102244Polarity TE 002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We desired to carefully evaluate a novel autologous heterogeneous skin construct in a prospective randomised clinical trial comparing this to a standard-of-care treatment in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). This study reports the interim analysis after the first half of the subjects have been analysed. Fifty patients (25 per group) with Wagner 1 ulcers were enrolled at 13 wound centres in the United States. Twenty-three subjects underwent the autologous heterogeneous skin construct harvest and application procedure once; two subjects required two applications due to loss of the first application. The primary endpoint was the proportion of wounds closed at 12 weeks. There were significantly more wounds closed in the treatment group (18/25; 72%) vs controls (8/25; 32%) at 12 weeks. The treatment group achieved significantly greater percent area reduction compared to the control group at every prespecified timepoint of 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks. Thirty-eight adverse events occurred in 11 subjects (44%) in the treatment group vs 48 in 14 controls (56%), 6 of which required study removal. In the treatment group, there were no serious adverse events related to the index ulcer. Two adverse events (index ulcer cellulitis and bleeding) were possibly related to the autologous heterogeneous skin construct. Data from this planned interim analysis support that application of autologous heterogeneous skin construct may be potentially effective therapy for DFUs and provide supportive data to complete the planned study.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootHumansProspective StudiesTransplantation, Autologousbiological productsdiabetic footrandomised controlled trialulcerwound healing

Identifiers

PMID33942506
PMCPMC8684853
OpenAlexW3159111639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.