Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942345›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Measuring association among censored antibody titer data.

Thao M P Tran, Steven Abrams, Marc Aerts, Kirsten Maertens, Niel Hens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. SPARCC: Semi-Parametric Robust Estimation in a Right-Censored Covariate Model.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thao M P TranI-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2336-8302
Steven AbramsI-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7353-9304
Marc AertsI-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1803-9072
Kirsten MaertensCentre for Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2880-441X
Niel HensI-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-0637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Censoring due to a limit of detection or limit of quantification happens quite often in many medical studies. Conventional approaches to deal with censoring when analyzing these data include, for example, the substitution method and the complete case (CC) analysis. More recently, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) has been increasingly used. While the CC analysis and the substitution method usually lead to biased estimates, the MLE approach appears to perform well in many situations. This article proposes an MLE approach to estimate the association between two measurements in the presence of censoring in one or both quantities. The central idea is to use a copula function to join the marginal distributions of the two measurements. In various simulation studies, we show that our approach outperforms existing conventional methods (CC and substitution analyses). In addition, rank-based measures of global association such as Kendall's tau or Spearman's rho can be studied, hence, attention is not only confined to Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient capturing solely linear association. We have shown in our simulations that our approach is robust to misspecification of the copula function or marginal distributions given a small association. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward MLE method to fit a (multiple) linear regression model in the presence of censoring in a covariate or both the covariate and the response. Given the marginal distribution of the censored covariate, our method outperforms conventional approaches. We also compare and discuss the performance of our method with multiple imputation and missing indicator model approaches.

Indexed as

Research DesignComputer SimulationHumansMultivariate Analysisantibody titersassociationgeometric mean concentrationleft-censored datamaximum likelihood inference

Identifiers

PMID33942345
PMCPMC8251995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.