Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942323›Full record

ReviewPsychophysiology2022

New methods for oscillation analyses push new theories of discrete cognition.

Mikael Lundqvist, Andreas Wutz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mikael LundqvistDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas WutzPicower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2807-0863
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical ways of analyzing neural time series data has led to static views on cognition, in which the cognitive processes are linked to sustained neural activity and interpreted as stationary states. The core analytical focus was on slow power modulations of neural oscillations averaged across many experimental trials. Whereas this custom analytical approach reduces the complexity and increases the signal-to-noise ratio, it may disregard or even remove important aspects of the underlying neural dynamics. Novel analysis methods investigate the instantaneous frequency and phase of neural oscillations and relate them to the precisely controlled timing of brief successive sensory stimuli. This enables to capture how cognitive processes unfold in discrete windows within and across oscillatory cycles. Moreover, several recent studies analyze the oscillatory power modulations on single experimental trials. They suggest that the power modulations are packed into discrete bursts of activity, which occur at different rates and times, and with different durations from trial-to-trial. Here, we review the current work that made use of these methodological advances for neural oscillations. These novel analysis perspectives emphasize that cognitive processes occur in discrete time windows, instead of sustained, stationary states. Evidence for discretization was observed for the entire range of cognitive functions from perception and attention to working memory, goal-directed thought and motor actions, as well as throughout the entire cortical hierarchy and in subcortical regions. These empirical observations create demand for new psychological theories and computational models of cognition in the brain, which integrate its discrete temporal dynamics.

Indexed as

CognitionTime PerceptionBrainBrain MappingHumansMemory, Short-Term

Identifiers

PMID33942323
PMCPMC11475370
OpenAlexW3159703030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.