ArticleCell stress & chaperones2021
Kinetic and structural parameters governing Fic-mediated adenylylation/AMPylation of the Hsp70 chaperone, BiP/GRP78.
Article in Cell stress & chaperones, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- AMPylation: key roles in biological regulation across prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The functional dynamics of FicD's TPR domain are modulated by the interaction with ATP and BiP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- FICD (FIC Domain Protein Adenylyl Transferase) Deficiency Protects Mice From Hypertrophy-Induced Heart Failure and Promotes BiP (Binding Immunoglobulin Protein) -Mediated Activation of the Unfolded Protein Response and Endoplasmic Reticulum-Selective Autophagy in Cardiomyocytes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Small-Molecule FICD Inhibitors Suppress Endogenous and Pathologic FICD-Mediated Protein AMPylation.ACS chemical biology · 2025Article
- Investigation of the physiological and molecular regulatory mechanism of soluble sugar metabolism inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Small molecule FICD inhibitors suppress endogenous and pathologic FICD-mediated protein AMPylation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Investigation of the Detailed AMPylated Reaction Mechanism for the Huntingtin Yeast-Interacting Protein E Enzyme HYPE.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Fic and non-Fic AMPylases: protein AMPylation in metazoans.Open biology · 2021Article
- LZerD Protein-Protein Docking Webserver Enhanced WithFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- A Fluorescence Polarization-Based High-Throughput Screen to Identify the First Small-Molecule Modulators of the Human Adenylyltransferase HYPE/FICD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Post-translational modifications of Hsp70 family proteins: Expanding the chaperone code.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Review
- Alpha-Synuclein Is a Target of Fic-Mediated Adenylylation/AMPylation: Possible Implications for Parkinson's Disease.Journal of molecular biology · 2019Article
- Decrypting the chaperone code.The Journal of biological chemistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fic (filamentation induced by cAMP) proteins regulate diverse cell signaling events by post-translationally modifying their protein targets, predominantly by the addition of an AMP (adenosine monophosphate). This modification is called Fic-mediated adenylylation or AMPylation. We previously reported that the human Fic protein, HYPE/FicD, is a novel regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) that maintains homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in response to stress from misfolded proteins. Specifically, HYPE regulates UPR by adenylylating the ER chaperone, BiP/GRP78, which serves as a sentinel for UPR activation. Maintaining ER homeostasis is critical for determining cell fate, thus highlighting the importance of the HYPE-BiP interaction. Here, we study the kinetic and structural parameters that determine the HYPE-BiP interaction. By measuring the binding and kinetic efficiencies of HYPE in its activated (Adenylylation-competent) and wild type (de-AMPylation-competent) forms for BiP in its wild type and ATP-bound conformations, we determine that HYPE displays a nearly identical preference for the wild type and ATP-bound forms of BiP in vitro and preferentially de-AMPylates the wild type form of adenylylated BiP. We also show that AMPylation at BiP's Thr366 versus Thr518 sites differentially affect its ATPase activity, and that HYPE does not adenylylate UPR accessory proteins like J-protein ERdJ6. Using molecular docking models, we explain how HYPE is able to adenylylate Thr366 and Thr518 sites in vitro. While a physiological role for AMPylation at both the Thr366 and Thr518 sites has been reported, our molecular docking model supports Thr518 as the structurally preferred modification site. This is the first such analysis of the HYPE-BiP interaction and offers critical insights into substrate specificity and target recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.