Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942183›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Quantitative fluorescence angiography aids novice and experienced surgeons in performing intestinal resection in well-perfused tissue.

Nikolaj Nerup, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen, Jonas Hedelund Rønn, Lars Konge, Lars Bo Svendsen, Michael Patrick Achiam

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaj NerupDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9 DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. nikolajnerup@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4066-2925
Morten Bo Søndergaard SvendsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Center for Human Resources and Education, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Jonas Hedelund RønnDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9 DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Lars KongeCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Center for Human Resources and Education, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Lars Bo SvendsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9 DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Michael Patrick AchiamDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9 DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrointestinal resection is a devastating complication with huge consequences for the patient. As AL is associated with poor blood supply, tools for objective assessment of perfusion are in high demand. Indocyanine green angiography (ICG-FA) and quantitative analysis of ICG-FA (q-ICG) seem promising. This study aimed to investigate whether ICG-FA and q-ICG could improve perfusion assessment performed by surgeons of different experience levels.

methodsThirteen small bowel segments with a varying degree of devascularization, including two healthy sham segments, were constructed in a porcine model. We recruited students, residents, and surgeons to perform perfusion assessment of the segments in white light (WL), with ICG-FA, and after q-ICG, all blinded to the degree of devascularization.

resultsForty-five participants fulfilled the study (18 novices, 12 intermediates, and 15 experienced). ICG and q-ICG helped the novices correctly detect the healthy bowel segments to experienced surgeons' level. ICG and q-ICG also helped novice surgeons to perform safer resections in healthy tissue compared with normal WL. The relative risk (RR) of leaving ischemic tissue in WL and ICG compared with q-ICG, even for experienced surgeons was substantial, intermediates (RR = 8.9, CI95% [4.0;20] and RR = 6.2, CI95% [2.7;14.1]), and experienced (RR = 4.7, CI95% [2.6;8.7] and RR = 4.0, CI95% [2.1;7.5]).

conclusionQ-ICG seems to guide surgeons, regardless of experience level, to safely perform resection in healthy tissue, compared with standard WL. Future research should focus on this novel tool's clinical impact.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsAnastomotic LeakAnimalsFluorescein AngiographyHumansIndocyanine GreenSwineIndocyanine GreenAnastomotic leakageFluorescence guided surgeryImage guided surgeryIndocyanine green angiographyNear-infrared imaging

Identifiers

PMID33942183
PMCPMC8921116
OpenAlexW3159387515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.