Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942127›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2021

Profiling of bacterial bloodstream infections in hematological and oncological patients based on a comparative survival analysis.

Sarah Weber, Aaron Magh, Michael Hogardt, Volkhard A J Kempf, Maria J G T Vehreschild, Hubert Serve, Sebastian Scheich, Björn Steffen

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah WeberDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. sarah.weber@kgu.de.
Aaron MaghDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michael HogardtUniversity Center for Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Volkhard A J KempfUniversity Center for Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Maria J G T VehreschildUniversity Center for Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hubert ServeDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sebastian ScheichDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. sebastian.scheich@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6408-3536
Björn SteffenDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. steffen@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a frequent complication in patients with hematological and oncological diseases. However, the impact of different bacterial species causing BSI and of multiple BSI remains incompletely understood. We performed a retrospective study profiling 637 bacterial BSI episodes in hematological and oncological patients. Based on the 30-day (30d) overall survival (OS), we analyzed different types of multiple BSI and grouped BSI-associated bacteria into clusters followed by further assessment of clinical and infection-related characteristics. We discovered that polymicrobial BSI (different organisms on the first day of a BSI episode) and sequential BSI (another BSI before the respective BSI episode) were associated with a worse 30d OS. Different bacterial groups could be classified into three BSI outcome clusters based on 30d OS: favorable (FAV) including mainly common skin contaminants, Escherichia spp. and Streptococcus spp.; intermediate (INT) including mainly Enterococcus spp., vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., and multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN); and adverse (ADV) including MDRGN with an additional carbapenem-resistance (MDRGN+CR). A polymicrobial or sequential BSI especially influenced the outcome in the combination of two INT cluster BSI. The presence of a polymicrobial BSI and the assignment into the BSI outcome clusters were identified as independent risk factors for 30d mortality in a Cox multivariate regression analysis. The assignment to a BSI outcome cluster and the differentiated perspective of multiple BSI open new insights into the prognosis of patients with BSI and should be further validated in other patient cohorts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaFemaleHematologic DiseasesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodstream infectionCancerClusterHematologyOncology

Identifiers

PMID33942127
PMCPMC8116230
OpenAlexW3159843143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.