Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942124›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2021

[Pancreas divisum and pancreatitis].

E Khristenko, C Tjaden, M Klauß

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E KhristenkoKlinik für Diagnostische & Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
C TjadenChirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M KlaußKlinik für Diagnostische & Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. Miriam.Klauss@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological issueDiagnostic and clinical relevance of pancreas divisum. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsUltrasonography (US), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). PERFORMANCE: Pancreas divisum is an anatomic variation of pancreatic duct system with an incidence in general population of about 10%. It can become symptomatic in approximately 5% of patients. MRI with MRCP is the method of choice to diagnose pancreas divisum. ACHIEVEMENTS: MRCP is equal to ERCP in diagnosing pancreas divisum in routine clinical practice as it is noninvasive, offers the possibility to evaluate the adjacent tissues and has almost no contraindications. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: It is important to be familiar with the anatomy of the pancreatic duct system in order to plan interventional procedures for symptomatic patients in due time.

Indexed as

PancreasPancreatitisCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceHumansPancreatic DuctsAnatomic pancreatic duct variationMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographyMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic ductSecretin

Identifiers

PMID33942124
OpenAlexW3157137573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.