Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942082›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Short communication: investigation of the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle.

Egill Gautason, Goutam Sahana, Guosheng Su, Baldur Helgi Benjamínsson, Guðmundur Jóhannesson, Bernt Guldbrandtsen

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Egill GautasonCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7343-0314
Goutam SahanaCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Guosheng SuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Baldur Helgi BenjamínssonFarmers Association of Iceland, 107 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Guðmundur JóhannessonIcelandic Agricultural Advisory Center, 107 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Bernt GuldbrandtsenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKInnovation Center Iceland · ISThe Icelandic Physiotherapy Association · ISUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Icelandic Cattle is a local dairy cattle breed in Iceland. With about 26,000 breeding females, it is by far the largest among the indigenous Nordic cattle breeds. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle. Pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were compared. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion of estimated breeding values (EBV) for milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY), and somatic cell score (SCS) were estimated in a cross validation-based design. Accuracy (r^) was estimated by the correlation between EBV and corrected phenotype in a validation set. The accuracy (r^) of predictions using ssGBLUP increased by 13, 23, 19, and 20 percentage points for MY, FY, PY, and SCS for genotyped animals, compared with PBLUP. The accuracy of nongenotyped animals was not improved for MY and PY, but increased by 0.9 and 3.5 percentage points for FY and SCS. We used the linear regression (LR) method to quantify relative improvements in accuracy, bias (Δ^), and dispersion (b^) of EBV. Using the LR method, the relative improvements in accuracy of validation from PBLUP to ssGBLUP were 43%, 60%, 50%, and 48% for genotyped animals for MY, FY, PY, and SCS. Single-step GBLUP EBV were less underestimated (Δ^), and less overdispersed (b^) than PBLUP EBV for FY and PY. Pedigree-based BLUP EBV were close to unbiased for MY and SCS. Single-step GBLUP underestimated MY EBV but overestimated SCS EBV. Based on the average accuracy of 0.45 for ssGBLUP EBV obtained in this study, selection intensities according to the breeding scheme of Icelandic Cattle, and assuming a generation interval of 2.0 yr for sires of bulls, sires of dams and dams of bulls, genetic gain in Icelandic Cattle could be increased by about 50% relative to the current breeding scheme.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsCattleFeasibility StudiesFemaleGenotypeMaleModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypeaccuracybiascattlegenetic gainselectionsingle-step

Identifiers

PMID33942082
PMCPMC8489424
OpenAlexW3157988281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.