Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942057›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Ultra-processed Foods and Cardiovascular Diseases: Potential Mechanisms of Action.

Filippa Juul, Georgeta Vaidean, Niyati Parekh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06996262 (The Relationship Between NOVA-Classified Processed Food Intake and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Türkiye), which is not on this map. Cited by 173 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
43.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06996262 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Relationship Between NOVA-Classified Processed Food Intake and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Türkiye

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstanbul Bilgi UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled236ConditionsCardiac Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Nutrition, Nutritional DiseaseArmsobservational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 332 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filippa JuulDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Georgeta VaideanSchool of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Florham Park, NJ, USA.
Niyati ParekhPublic Health Nutrition Program, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-0528
New York University · USNorthwell Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-processed foods are industrially manufactured ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat formulations containing food additives and little or no whole foods, in contrast to processed foods, which are whole foods preserved by traditional techniques such as canning or pickling. Recent epidemiological studies suggest that higher consumption of ultra-processed food is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, epidemiological evidence needs to be corroborated with criteria of biological plausibility. This review summarizes the current evidence on the putative biological mechanisms underlying the associations between ultra-processed foods and CVD. Research ranging from laboratory-based to prospective epidemiological studies and experimental evidence suggest that ultra-processed foods may affect cardiometabolic health through a myriad of mechanisms, beyond the traditionally recognized individual nutrients. Processing induces significant changes to the food matrix, for which ultra-processed foods may affect health outcomes differently than unrefined whole foods with similar nutritional composition. Notably, the highly degraded physical structure of ultra-processed foods may affect cardiometabolic health by influencing absorption kinetics, satiety, glycemic response, and the gut microbiota composition and function. Food additives and neo-formed contaminants produced during processing may also play a role in CVD risk. Key biological pathways include altered serum lipid concentrations, modified gut microbiota and host-microbiota interactions, obesity, inflammation, oxidative stress, dysglycemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension. Further research is warranted to clarify the proportional harm associated with the nutritional composition, food additives, physical structure, and other attributes of ultra-processed foods. Understanding how ultra-processing changes whole foods and through which pathways these foods affect health is a prerequisite for eliminating harmful processing techniques and ingredients.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDietFast FoodsFood HandlingHumansProspective Studiescardiometabolic healthfood additivesmicrobiomeNOVAobesity

Identifiers

PMID33942057
PMCPMC8483964
OpenAlexW3157346013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.