Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942023›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2021

Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from dried blood spot samples with the Roche Elecsys Immunochemistry method.

Elizabeth Fontaine, Cristian Saez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth FontaineCoreMedica Laboratories, Inc, Lee's Summit, Missouri, USA.
Cristian SaezCoreMedica Laboratories, Inc, Lee's Summit, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the application of the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay to capillary dried blood samples for high throughput analyses on Roche COBAS 6000 systems. DESIGN AND

methodsThe performance of the of the Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay was assessed using three sets of dried blood spot samples. Method correlation was performed using spiked blood samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using paired donor samples. An additional cohort of 50 individuals, including COVID-19 convalescent cases, was used for the evaluation of at-home collection for mail transport, and stability studies.

resultsThe Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay using dried blood spot samples showed an excellent agreement of 98.9% with results obtained using their paired serum samples, and 86.7% accuracy with dried blood spots collected after 9 days from diagnostic (PCR) tests.

conclusionsCapillary dried blood spot samples can be confidently used on Roche COBAS automated analyzers to monitor the epidemiology of COVID-19, and are suitable for use in large-scale screening programs.

Indexed as

Dried blood spotLOINC 95825-6Monitoring of COVID-19 epidemiologySARS-CoV-2ScreeningSNOMED-CT 440500007

Identifiers

PMID33942023
PMCPMC8080505
OpenAlexW3158280818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.