ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021
Erythropoietic protoporphyria: time to prodrome, the warning signal to exit sun exposure without pain-a patient-reported outcome efficacy measure.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collaboration as a Catalyst for Advancing Rare Disease Research: The Experience of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- New pharmacotherapies for the erythropoietic protoporphyrias: an analysis of trial protocols from a patient perspective.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Real-world assessment of the patient profile, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes associated with erythropoietic and X-linked protoporphyria.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Erythropoietic protoporphyrias: Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Development and Content Validation of Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Disease Severity and Change in Patients with Erythropoietic Protoporphyria: The EPP Impact Questionnaire (EPIQ).Patient related outcome measures · 2024Article
- Current trials in erythropoietic protoporphyria: are placebo controls ethical?Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Recognized and Emerging Features of Erythropoietic and X-Linked Protoporphyria.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Enhancing and leveraging principal investigator and patient advocacy group collaboration in rare disease clinical research-meeting report from the rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP), a severe painful photodermatosis, experience prodromal sensations when exposed to sunlight, which are the "warning signals" to exit the sun, as prolonged exposure causes an excruciatingly painful phototoxic attack. The unique prodromal cutaneous sensations are reversible and differ from the severe burning pain attack lasting 2-7 days. Previously, afamelanotide treatment was studied using time to pain or time outside as primary outcome measures. Since patients have an ingrained fear of sunlight, these measures did not capture the full treatment effect. We retrospectively characterized and evaluated time to prodrome (TTP) as a safer, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in afamelanotide-treated patients.
methodsStructured interviews recorded TTP before and during afamelanotide treatment in retrospective US and Dutch cohort studies.
resultsThirty-one US and 58 Dutch EPP patients participated. Before afamelanotide treatment, 54.8% US and 39.7% Dutch patients reported TTP onset <10 minutes in direct sunlight. In both studies, patients' TTP's were significantly longer during afamelanotide treatment (p < 0.0001). All US patients' TTP increased; no TTP was <10 minutes. Among Dutch patients 81% improved; only 10.3% reported TTPs < 10 minutes.
conclusionEPP patients reported substantial improvements in TTP during afamelanotide treatment. TTP could provide a safer, PRO-based efficacy endpoint for assessing future EPP treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33941881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.