Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941867›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021

Optimizing prostate-targeted biopsy schemes in men with multiple mpMRI visible lesions: should we target all suspicious areas? Results of a two institution series.

Armando Stabile, Francesco Barletta, Giovanni Motterle, Francesco Pellegrino, Gabriele Sorce, Elio Mazzone, Simone Scuderi, Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Vito Cucchiara, Antonio Esposito and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Armando StabileDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. armando.stabile88@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-0069
Francesco BarlettaDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni MotterleDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Francesco PellegrinoDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele SorceDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elio MazzoneDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1932-1800
Simone ScuderiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Ottone CirulliDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vito CucchiaraDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Antonio EspositoDepartment of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GandagliaDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Nicola FossatiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-3725
Francesco De CobelliDepartment of Radiology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alberto BrigantiDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the diagnostic added value of sampling secondary lesions at prostate mpMRI (SL) in addition to index lesion (IL) in detecting significant prostate cancer (csPCa) when also systematic biopsy (SBx) is performed.

methodsWe relied on a cohort of 312 men with two suspicious lesions at prostate mpMRI who underwent subsequent targeted biopsy of each lesion (TBx) and concomitant SBx at two tertiary-referral centers between 2013 and 2019. The study outcome was the added value of targeting SL (i.e., the one with a lower PI-RADS score and/or the smaller size compared to IL) in the detection of csPCa. To this aim, we compared different biopsy strategies (SBx + overall TBx vs SBx + IL-targeted biopsy vs SBx + SL-targeted biopsy) and assessed whether SL features could be correlated with detection of csPCa at overall TBx in a multivariable logistic regression model (MVA).

resultsOverall, 44% of men had csPCa at TBx of all lesions while 39% and 23% of men had csPCa found in IL and SL, respectively. The rate of csPCa found at SBx, IL-TBx, and SL-TBx only was 5%, 6%, and 2%, respectively. The detection rate of csPCa for SBx + IL-TBx was 47%. The addition of SL-TBx increased csPCa detection by only 2% (p = 0.12). At MVA, neither PI-RADS of SL nor the number of cores targeting SL was associated with an increased detection of csPCa (all p > 0.3). Conversely, age (OR: 1.07), PSA (OR: 1.07), prostate volume (OR: 0.98), and PI-RADS of the IL (OR: 2.36) were independently associated with csPCa detection at TBx (all p < 0.01).

conclusionsThere is no significant benefit in terms of csPCa detection when an adequate SBx is performed in combination with IL-TBx in patients with multiple mpMRI lesions. In these men target biopsy of secondary lesions can be safely omitted.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedContrast MediaHumansImage-Guided BiopsyItalyMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaNeoplasm GradingProstatic NeoplasmsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID33941867
OpenAlexW3159649092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.