Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941672›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Conditional sanctioning in a legume-

Annet Westhoek, Laura J Clark, Michael Culbert, Neil Dalchau, Megan Griffiths, Beatriz Jorrin, Ramakrishnan Karunakaran, Raphael Ledermann, Andrzej Tkacz, Isabel Webb and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbial drivers of root plasticity.The New phytologist · 2025
    Review
  12. Mobile gene clusters and coexpressed plant-rhizobium pathways drive partner quality variation in symbiosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Annet WesthoekDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-4287
Laura J ClarkDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-2420
Michael CulbertDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.
Neil DalchauBiological Computation, Microsoft Research Cambridge, CB1 2FB Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Megan GriffithsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.
Beatriz JorrinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6198-0925
Ramakrishnan KarunakaranDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, NR4 7UH Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6450-1299
Raphael LedermannDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-1708
Andrzej TkaczDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.
Isabel WebbDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom.
Euan K JamesEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, DD2 5DA Invergowrie, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7969-6570
Philip S PooleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom; philip.poole@plants.ox.ac.uk lindsay.turnbull@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-6455
Lindsay A TurnbullDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3RB Oxford, United Kingdom; philip.poole@plants.ox.ac.uk lindsay.turnbull@plants.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBJames Hutton Institute · GBJohn Innes Centre · GBMicrosoft Research (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J007749/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014524/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N013387/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001801/1BLRD VA BB/M011224/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Legumes are high in protein and form a valuable part of human diets due to their interaction with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria known as rhizobia. Plants house rhizobia in specialized root nodules and provide the rhizobia with carbon in return for nitrogen. However, plants usually house multiple rhizobial strains that vary in their fixation ability, so the plant faces an investment dilemma. Plants are known to sanction strains that do not fix nitrogen, but nonfixers are rare in field settings, while intermediate fixers are common. Here, we modeled how plants should respond to an intermediate fixer that was otherwise isogenic and tested model predictions using pea plants. Intermediate fixers were only tolerated when a better strain was not available. In agreement with model predictions, nodules containing the intermediate-fixing strain were large and healthy when the only alternative was a nonfixer, but nodules of the intermediate-fixing strain were small and white when the plant was coinoculated with a more effective strain. The reduction in nodule size was preceded by a lower carbon supply to the nodule even before differences in nodule size could be observed. Sanctioned nodules had reduced rates of nitrogen fixation, and in later developmental stages, sanctioned nodules contained fewer viable bacteria than nonsanctioned nodules. This indicates that legumes can make conditional decisions, most likely by comparing a local nodule-dependent cue of nitrogen output with a global cue, giving them remarkable control over their symbiotic partners.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalSymbiosisCarbonFabaceaeNitrogenNitrogen FixationRhizobiumRoot Nodules, PlantCarbonNitrogenlegumeresource allocationrhizobiasanctionsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID33941672
PMCPMC8126861
OpenAlexW3158070535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.