Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941632›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in medium-to-large-sized prostates (ATHLETE): protocol of a prospective randomised trial.

Gautier Müllhaupt, Sabine Güsewell, Hans-Peter Schmid, Valentin Zumstein, Patrick Betschart, Daniel S Engeler, Dominik Abt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04560907 (Aquablation vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Medium to Large Size Prostates), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04560907 narecruitingnot on this map

Aquablation vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Medium to Large Size Prostates: A Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. med. Gautier MüllhauptRan2021 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)ArmsAquablation, HoLEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gautier MüllhauptDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland gautier.muellhaupt@kssg.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-5725-5608
Sabine GüsewellClinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Hans-Peter SchmidDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Valentin ZumsteinDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Patrick BetschartDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Daniel S EngelerDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
Dominik AbtDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.
University of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA novel method for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) called Aquablation has become commercially available. Previous studies have been able to show similar functional results when compared with transurethral resection of the prostate and a high efficacy has been demonstrated when this approach is applied to patients with a prostate size of 80-150 cm METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at a Swiss centre of tertiary care. The primary outcome is assessment of non-inferiority of Aquablation compared with HoLEP in reducing lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Randomisation will be performed using secuTrial, stratifying on age (<70 years, 70+ years) and prostate volume (<100 mL, 100+ mL). Both interventions are performed in an inpatient setting and regular follow-up controls starting 8 weeks after intervention and continuing up to 5 years will be performed. The primary outcome (change in IPSS from baseline to 6 months) will be tested for non-inferiority with a one-sided t-test. Secondary outcomes, such as efficacy parameters, several patient-reported outcome measures, and periprocedural and safety parameters will be described by calculating means or relative frequencies for each treatment group and testing differences with two-sided standard superiority tests. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the local ethics committee (EKOS 2020-02353). Results of the primary endpoint and each of the secondary endpoints will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04560907).

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateAgedEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMaleProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeadult urologyprostate diseasesurgery

Identifiers

PMID33941632
PMCPMC8098986
OpenAlexW3158631929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.