Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941247›Full record

Trial reportTrials2021

Recruiting for research on sensitive topics in schools: an experience with Vaxcards, a collectable vaccine card game.

D S Epstein, J C Enticott, H J Larson, C Barton

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

D S EpsteinDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Building 1, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting hill, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia. dan.epstein@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-7749
J C EnticottDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Building 1, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting hill, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
H J LarsonThe Vaccine Confidence Project, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
C BartonDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Building 1, 1/270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting hill, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Monash University · AUInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation · USMonash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undertaking recruitment for research in schools is an effective way to recruit young people for research participation but it is not without its challenges. Gaining access and coordinating many levels of different organisations and stakeholders whose cooperation and approval are crucial all add time and sometimes logistical challenges for the research team. In addition, recruiting around sensitive research topics can elicit additional barriers to successful research. The research team aimed to conduct a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial involving schools in a local government region in Victoria, Australia, to assess the effect of a vaccination-based educational card game called "Vaxcards" on vaccine consent returns. Schools were contacted via phone and email to determine which staff member would best be a contact point for a face-to-face meeting to discuss the methods and purpose of the study. Email follow-ups were scheduled to follow up non-responsive schools and consent forms. The minimum required sample size was 13. Of 31 eligible schools, 13 were recruited. The research team encountered several unanticipated challenges before achieving the recruitment target. The most common reasons for non-participation were being too busy with other commitments, concerns regarding the topic of vaccination being too sensitive, and concerns that key stakeholders in the school would not approve of the research topic of vaccination. One school required a review by a private research ethics board that rejected the study. Significant hesitancy and misinformation about vaccine science was observed that affected engagement with a small number of schools. This paper highlights the challenges of recruiting schools in the context of public anxieties about vaccines and has several important learning lessons for successful recruitment about sensitive topics. This includes navigating approval processes for research in schools, the importance of local champions, dealing with misinformation and the importance of strong relationships and organisational trust.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618001753246 . Prospectively registered on 25 October 2018 8:24:21 AM.

Indexed as

Data ManagementVaccinesAdolescentHumansSchoolsVaccinationVictoriaVaccinesHealth educationHealth promotionPreventative healthVaccinationVaccination rateVaccineVaccine confidenceVaccine consentVaccine educationVaccine hesitancyVaccine schedule

Identifiers

PMID33941247
PMCPMC8091533
OpenAlexW3157659519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.