Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941241›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2021

Artificial intelligence-based computational framework for drug-target prioritization and inference of novel repositionable drugs for Alzheimer's disease.

Shingo Tsuji, Takeshi Hase, Ayako Yachie-Kinoshita, Taiko Nishino, Samik Ghosh, Masataka Kikuchi, Kazuro Shimokawa, Hiroyuki Aburatani, Hiroaki Kitano, Hiroshi Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Neural network embedding of functional microconnectome.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shingo Tsuji *Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan. tsuji@genome.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0234-9519
Takeshi Hase *The Systems Biology Institute, Saisei Ikedayama Bldg. 5-10-25 Higashi Gotanda Shinagawa, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Ayako Yachie-KinoshitaThe Systems Biology Institute, Saisei Ikedayama Bldg. 5-10-25 Higashi Gotanda Shinagawa, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Taiko NishinoThe Systems Biology Institute, Saisei Ikedayama Bldg. 5-10-25 Higashi Gotanda Shinagawa, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Samik GhoshThe Systems Biology Institute, Saisei Ikedayama Bldg. 5-10-25 Higashi Gotanda Shinagawa, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Masataka KikuchiDepartment of Genome Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kazuro ShimokawaCenter for Mathematical Modeling and Data Science, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka City, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan.
Hiroyuki AburataniResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan.
Hiroaki KitanoThe Systems Biology Institute, Saisei Ikedayama Bldg. 5-10-25 Higashi Gotanda Shinagawa, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Hiroshi TanakaInstitute of Education, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 20F, M&D Tower, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying novel therapeutic targets is crucial for the successful development of drugs. However, the cost to experimentally identify therapeutic targets is huge and only approximately 400 genes are targets for FDA-approved drugs. As a result, it is inevitable to develop powerful computational tools that can identify potential novel therapeutic targets. Fortunately, the human protein-protein interaction network (PIN) could be a useful resource to achieve this objective.

methodsIn this study, we developed a deep learning-based computational framework that extracts low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional PIN data. Our computational framework uses latent features and state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to infer potential drug target genes.

resultsWe applied our computational framework to prioritize novel putative target genes for Alzheimer's disease and successfully identified key genes that may serve as novel therapeutic targets (e.g., DLG4, EGFR, RAC1, SYK, PTK2B, SOCS1). Furthermore, based on these putative targets, we could infer repositionable candidate-compounds for the disease (e.g., tamoxifen, bosutinib, and dasatinib).

conclusionsOur deep learning-based computational framework could be a powerful tool to efficiently prioritize new therapeutic targets and enhance the drug repositioning strategy.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseasePharmaceutical PreparationsArtificial IntelligenceDrug RepositioningHumansMachine LearningPharmaceutical PreparationsDeep learningDrug discoveryMachine learningNetwork embeddingProtein interaction networkSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID33941241
PMCPMC8091739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.