Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33941159›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Health workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to implementing a new national cervical cancer screening program in Ethiopia.

Breanne E Lott, Atota Halkiyo, Dawit Worku Kassa, Tesfaye Kebede, Abdulkerim Dedefo, John Ehiri, Purnima Madhivanan, Scott Carvajal, Amr Soliman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Breanne E LottDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA. belott@email.arizona.edu.
Atota HalkiyoMary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, 1050 S. Forest Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Dawit Worku KassaAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tesfaye KebedeRobe Town Health Office, Bale Robe, Ethiopia.
Abdulkerim DedefoAdama Hospital Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia.
John EhiriDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Purnima MadhivananDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Scott CarvajalDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 1295 N. Martin Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Amr SolimanSchool of Medicine, The City University of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
University of Arizona · USAdama Science and Technology University · ETAddis Ababa University · ETArizona State University · USCity University of New York · USPublic Health Research Institute Of India · IN

Funding

Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations Program-15R25CA112383 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Amr Soliman · 2006 to 2026
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer disproportionately affects women in sub-Saharan Africa, compared with other world regions. In Ethiopia, a National Cancer Control Plan published in 2015, outlines an ambitious strategy to reduce the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. This strategy includes widespread screening using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). As the national screening program has rolled out, there has been limited inquiry of provider experiences. This study aims to describe cancer control experts' perspectives regarding the cancer control strategy and implementation of VIA.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with 18 participants elicited provider perspectives on cervical cancer prevention and screening. Open-ended interview questions queried barriers and facilitators to implementation of a new national screening program. Responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and mapped to the Integrated Behavioral Model. Participants were health providers and administrators with positionality as cancer control experts including screening program professionals, oncologists, and cancer focal persons at town, zone, and federal health offices at eleven government facilities in the Arsi, Bale, and Shoa zones of the Oromia region, and in the capital Addis Ababa.

resultsThe cancer control plan and screening method, VIA, were described by participants as contextually appropriate and responsive to the unique service delivery challenges in Ethiopia. Screening implementation barriers included low community- and provider-awareness of cervical cancer and screening, lack of space and infrastructure to establish the screening center, lack of materials including cryotherapy machines for the "screen-and-treat" approach, and human resource issues such as high-turnover of staff and administration. Participant-generated solutions included additional training for providers, demand creation to increase patient flow through mass media campaigns, decentralization of screening from large regional hospitals to local health centers, improved monitoring and evaluation, and incentivization of screening services to motivate health providers.

conclusionsAs the Ethiopian government refines its Cancer Control Plan and scales up screening service implementation throughout the country, the findings from this study can inform the policies and practices of cervical cancer screening. Provider perspectives of barriers and facilitators to effective cancer control and screening implementation reveal areas for continued improvement such as provider training and coordination and collaboration in the health system.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleHumansMass ScreeningCancer preventionCervical screeningLow-resource settingPreventive healthService deliveryWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID33941159
PMCPMC8090515
OpenAlexW3157312028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.