ArticleBMC surgery2021
Keyhole versus Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parastomal hernia after robot-assisted cystectomy and ileum conduit: incidence, risk or protective factors and outcomes of minimal-invasive hernia repair-systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Management and outcomes profiles of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Parastomal hernias after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: surgical treatment and the use of prophylactic mesh: a systematic review.BMC surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of recurrence and quality-of-Life outcomes after robotic versus laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Robotic sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: updated series and outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Review
- Initial and recurrent management of parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a 10 year single-center experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic parastomal hernia repair in Ileal-conduit patients: short-term results in a single-center cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair of parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: a single-center experience.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Repair of parastomal hernia after Bricker procedure: retrospective consecutive experience of a tertiary center.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- How often is prophylactic parastomal mesh placement performed after rectal resection without sphincter preservation? An analysis of German nationwide hospital discharge data among 41,697 patients.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Surgical management of parastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit: A french multi-institutional experience.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results.Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- [Robotic hernia surgery IV. German version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious research on parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion is limited. This nationwide cohort study aims to present the results of keyhole and Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair in the setting of ileal conduit urinary diversion.
methodAll patients in this cohort underwent primary elective parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion in four university hospitals and one central hospital in Finland in 2007-2017. Retrospective clinical data were collected from patient registries to compare keyhole and Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair techniques. The primary outcome was parastomal hernia recurrence during the follow-up from primary surgery to the last confirmed follow-up date of the patient. The secondary outcomes were reoperations during the follow-up and complication rate at 30 days' follow-up.
resultsThe results of 28 hernioplasties were evaluated. The overall parastomal hernia recurrence rate was 18%, the re-operation rate was 14%, and the complication rate was 14% during the median follow-up time of 30 (21-64) months. Recurrence rates were 22% (4/18) after keyhole repair and 10% (1/10) after Sugarbaker repair. Re-operation rates referred to keyhole repair were 22% and Sugarbaker repair 0% during follow-up. The majority of reoperations were indicated by recurrence. Complication rates were 17% after keyhole and 10% after Sugarbaker repair during the 30 days' follow-up.
conclusionThe results of parastomal hernia repair in the setting of ileal conduits are below optimal in this nationwide cohort comparing keyhole to Sugarbaker repair in elective parastomal hernia repair. Nonetheless, the Sugarbaker technique should be further studied to confirm the encouraging results of this cohort in terms of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.