ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021
Artificial intelligence improves the accuracy of residents in the diagnosis of hip fractures: a multicenter study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for X-ray scaphoid fracture detection: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning on diagnosis and classification of hip fracture: systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates of artificial intelligence for diagnosing orthopedic fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Enhanced YOLOv8 with Hybrid Attention Gating Block for Intertrochanteric Fracture Detection in Complex X-Ray Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Human-AI Collaboration in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures shows excellent sensitivity and specificity and reduces the need for computed tomography scans in emergency rooms.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Enhanced YOLOv8-seg-SPDConv for accurate Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Garden classification of femoral neck fracture using deep-learning algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flexing ChatGPT-4o's Diagnostic Muscle: Detection of Fractures in the Ossifying Pediatric Elbow on Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Radiomics and deep learning model based on X-ray imaging for the assisted diagnosis of early Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- From data to precision: The transformative role of AI and machine learning in modern orthopaedic practice.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Detection and classification of femoral neck fractures from plain pelvic X-rays using deep learning and machine learning methods.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
- An automated hip fracture detection, classification system on pelvic radiographs and comparison with 35 clinicians.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent topics in musculoskeletal imaging focused on clinical applications of AI: How should radiologists approach and use AI?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnostic Methods in Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- YOLOX-SwinT algorithm improves the accuracy of AO/OTA classification of intertrochanteric fractures by orthopedic trauma surgeons.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025Article
- Article
- Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.Current medical science · 2024Review
- Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLess experienced clinicians sometimes make misdiagnosis of hip fractures. We developed computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for hip fractures on plain X-rays using a deep learning model trained on a large dataset. In this study, we examined whether the accuracy of the diagnosis of hip fracture of the residents could be improved by using this system.
methodsA deep convolutional neural network approach was used for machine learning. Pytorch 1.3 and Fast.ai 1.0 were applied as frameworks, and an EfficientNet-B4 model (a pre-trained ImageNet model) was used. We handled the 5295 X-rays from the patients with femoral neck fracture or femoral trochanteric fracture from 2009 to 2019. We excluded cases in which the bilateral hips were not included within an image range, and cases of femoral shaft fracture and periprosthetic fracture. Finally, we included 5242 AP pelvic X-rays from 4851 cases. We divided these 5242 images into two images per image, and prepared 5242 images including fracture site and 5242 images without fracture site. Thus, a total of 10,484 images were used for machine learning. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-value, and area under the curve (AUC) were assessed. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to conceptualize the basis for the diagnosis of the fracture by the deep learning algorithm. Secondly, we conducted a controlled experiment with clinicians. Thirty-one residents;young doctors within 2 years of graduation from medical school who rotate through various specialties, were tested using 300 hip fracture images that were randomly extracted from the dataset. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy with and without the use of the CAD system for each of the 300 images.
resultsThe accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F-value, and AUC were 96.1, 95.2, 96.9%, 0.961, and 0.99, respectively, with the correct diagnostic basis generated by Grad-CAM. In the controlled experiment, the diagnostic accuracy of the residents significantly improved when they used the CAD system.
conclusionsWe developed a newly CAD system with a deep learning algorithm from a relatively large dataset from multiple institutions. Our system achieved high diagnostic performance. Our system improved the diagnostic accuracy of residents for hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Foundational evidence, before-after study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.